Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People #7 v Attorney General of New South Wales

Case [2019] FCA 1177


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People #7 v Attorney General of New South Wales [2019] FCA 1177

File number: NSD 857 of 2017
NSD 543 of 2013
NSD 1786 of 2016
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 26 July 2019
Date of publication of reasons 31 July 2019
Date of hearing: 23 July 2019
Date of last submissions: 26 July 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Native Title
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr S Blackshield of Blackshield Lawyers
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Ms S Davis of Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Tenth Respondent: The 10th respondent appeared in person
Counsel for the Twelfth Respondent: The 12th respondent appeared in person by telephone
Counsel for the Thirteenth Respondent: The 13th respondent appeared in person
Counsel for the Sixteenth Respondent: The 16th respondent appeared in person by telephone
Counsel for the Seventeenth Respondent: The 17th respondent appeared in person by telephone
Solicitor for the 32nd Respondent: Mr D Schultz of NSWLAC
Solicitor for the 33rd Respondent: Ms M Holt of NTSCORP Limited
Counsel for the 34th Respondent: The 34th respondent appeared in person by telephone
Counsel for the 35th Respondent: The 35th respondent appeared in person by telephone
Solicitor for the 69th Respondent: Ms K Perincek of DLA Piper Australia
Counsel for the 101st Respondent: The 101st respondent appeared in person

ORDERS

NSD 857 of 2017
NSD 543 of 2013
NSD 1786 of 2016
BETWEEN:

WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI PEOPLE #7

First Applicant

WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI PEOPLE #2

Second Applicant

WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI PEOPLE #6

Third Applicant

AND:

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES (and others named in the Schedule)

First Respondent

JUDGE:

GRIFFITHS J

DATE OF ORDER:

26 JULY 2019

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Lithgow City Council be joined as a party to the proceedings under s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

2.Pursuant to section 86B(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), this matter is referred for further mediation between the applicant, NTSCORP Limited and the active Indigenous Respondents by a Registrar of the Court.

3.The further mediation is to be commence by 16 September 2019 and conclude by 21 November 2019. 

4.The Registrar is to provide a mediation report to the Court by 22 November 2019. 

5.The applicant to file a progress report by 4 December 2019. 

6.The matter is to be listed  case management hearing on 11 December 2019. 

7.The parties have liberty to restore on 48 hours’ notice. 

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

GRIFFITHS J:

  1. These three matters were listed for a case management hearing on 23 July 2019.  Technical difficulties created by the number of parties appearing by telephone at the same time caused the hearing to be terminated. 

  2. Later that day, the parties were contacted by the Registry and told that, in order to avoid unnecessary future expense by having a further case management hearing, the Court was minded to make proposed orders joining Lithgow City Council as a party to the proceeding and also making orders for the three matters to proceed to a further mediation. 

  3. The parties were invited to file and serve a written outline of submissions in opposition to the proposed joinder order and/or proposed orders concerning a further mediation. 

  4. No opposition was expressed to the making of the joinder order.  The Court is satisfied, based on the affidavit dated 1 May 2019 of Graeme Faulkner that the Council’s interests may be affected.  Based on Mr Faulkner’s affidavit, the Court is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice that Lithgow City Council be joined as a party in the proceeding. 

  5. The second part of the scheduled case management hearing related to the issue whether the three proceedings should be referred for further mediation between the applicant, NTSCORP Limited and the active Indigenous Respondents.  The Court received proposed minutes of orders to that effect from the applicant and NTSCORP.  Mr Reilly, who represents the Ibbai Waggan respondents also notified the Registry that they now have legal representation for the purposes of participating and the mediation. 

  6. By an email sent to all parties on the afternoon of 23 July 2019, the Court advised that it was minded to make orders along the lines of the proposed short minutes of order provided by the applicant in preparation for the case management hearing, but it gave an opportunity for anyone to oppose that course by filing a brief written submission before 4:15pm 26 July 2019 as to why the proposed orders should not be made.  The parties were advised that the Court would determine the matters on the papers and without a further hearing. 

  7. The only person who opposed the making of the proposed orders was Mr Trevor Robinson, who represented himself and was a previously inactive Indigenous Respondent, who wished to become active.  He asked that the mediation process be delayed and not begin until 1 November 2019.  He said that he wished to call several Wiradjuri nation meetings to discuss the Warrabinga-Wiradjuri claim and to solicit affidavits from the Wiradjuri people regarding these matters.  He said that he also wanted to provide the Wiradjuri people with a letter he had written to the Australian National Audit Office regarding what he described as “the abuse of the Native Title Process for financial gain through “phoenix operations”.” 

  8. Mr Robinson has not persuaded me that the proposed further mediation process should be delayed.  Mr Robinson has between now and 16 September 2019 (the earliest point from which the proposed mediation can commence), to attend to the matters he describes.  It is in everyone’s interest that the mediation process not be delayed any further because it has the prospect of narrowing the disputed issues and reducing the scope for costly contested legal proceedings.

    Conclusion

  9. For these reasons, an order will be made joining Lithgow City Council as a respondent in the proceeding and orders will be made in relation to the proposed mediation.

I certify that the preceding nine (9) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Griffiths.

Associate:

Dated:       31 July 2019

SCHEDULE OF PARTIES

NSD 857 of 2017
NSD 543 of 2013
NSD 1786 of 2016

First Applicant WENDY LEWIS
Second Applicant MAVIS AGNEW

Third Applicant

MARTIN DELAUNEY

Applicant

WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI #7

Second Respondent

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Third Respondent

BLUE MOUNTAINS CITY COUNCIL

Fourth Respondent

MID-WESTERN REGIONAL COUNCIL

Fifth Respondent

DINAWAN DYRRIBANG UNCLE BILL ALLEN JR

Sixth Respondent

LLOYD ATKINSON

Seventh Respondent

EMMA MAY GRACE ATTKINS

Eighth Respondent

BATHURST LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Ninth Respondent

JUDY BELL

Tenth Respondent

BRADLEY ROBERT BLISS

Eleventh Respondent

PAUL WILLIAM BRYDON

Twelfth Respondent

KIM MAY BURKE

Thirteenth Respondent

WAYNE ALFRED CARR

Fourteenth Respondent

ISABEL COE

Fifteenth Respondent

LESLIE JOHN COE

Sixteenth Respondent

LYNDA-JUNE COE

Seventeenth Respondent

BRENDON JOHN COOK

Eighteenth Respondent

HAYDON THOMAS CROOK

Nineteenth Respondent

DEERUBBIN LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Twentieth Respondent

YANHADARRAMBAL JADE WILLIAM FLYNN

Twenty First Respondent

BRIAN GRANT

Twenty Second Respondent

PETA SUSAN HOLMES

Twenty Third Respondent

KEITH KEMP

Twenty Fourth Respondent

KERRIE LEE LEWIS

Twenty Fifth Respondent

KEVIN SAMUEL MAYS

Twenty Sixth Respondent

KACIE MITCHELL

Twenty Seventh Respondent

MUDGEE LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Twenty Eighth Respondent

CLINTON NIX

Twenty Ninth Respondent

JAYLA NIX

Thirtieth Respondent

PAMELA NIX

Thirty First Respondent

ZAC NIX

Thirty Second Respondent

NSW ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Thirty Third Respondent

NTSCORP LIMITED

Thirty Fourth Respondent

JOHN THOMAS RILEY

Thirty Fifth Respondent

TREVOR ROBINSON

Thirty Sixth Respondent

ALEXANDRA MAREE ROSS

Thirty Seventh Respondent

CASSANDRA JAYNE ROSS

Thirty Eighth Respondent

SANDRA MAREE ROSS

Thirty Ninth Respondent

ZACHARY JOHN HENDERSON ROSS

Fortieth Respondent

GREGORY JOHN SMITH

Forty First Respondent

JASON SMITH

Forty Second Respondent

KAREN SMITH

Forty Third Respondent

NATLY SMITH

Forty Fourth Respondent

PATRICIA SMITH

Forty Fifth Respondent

ROBERT SMITH

Forty Sixth Respondent

STEPHEN SMITH

Forty Seventh Respondent

LATOYA TERRY

Forty Eighth Respondent

STEPHANIE TERRY

Forty Ninth Respondent

NORMA MARY THOMAS

Fiftieth Respondent

WANARUAH LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL

Fifty First Respondent

WELLINGTON VALLEY WIRADJURI ABORIGINAL CORPORATION

Fifty Second Respondent

BRETT JAMES WHYMAN

Fifty Third Respondent

DOROTHY FAY WHYMAN

Fifty Fourth Respondent

EDWARD CHARLES WHYMAN

Fifty Fifth Respondent

ROBERT HEWITT WHYMAN

Fifty Sixth Respondent

VANESSA FAY WHYMAN

Fifty Seventh Respondent

PETER HOWARD WIGHTON

Fifty Eighth Respondent

AARON JAMES WILLIAMS

Fifty Ninth Respondent

DALLAS JOHN WILLIAMS

Sixtieth Respondent

TAYLAH JADE WILLIAMS

Sixty First Respondent

TYSON JAMES WILLIAMS

Sixty Second Respondent

ZACHERY AARON WILLIAMS

Sixty Third Respondent

BIANCA JADE WILSON

Sixty Fourth Respondent

DANE JOSEPH WILSON

Sixty Fifth Respondent

DYLAN JAY WILSON

Sixty Sixth Respondent

KYLE JAMES WILSON

Sixty Seventh Respondent

VANESSA ELIZABETH WILSON

Sixty Eighth Respondent

RUSSELL KEITH DICKENS

Sixty Ninth Respondent

EMIRATES HOTELS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED ACN 113 608 414

Seventieth Respondent

GREGORY LYLE HUNDY

Seventy First Respondent

JAMES WILLIAM EDWARD WALKER

Seventy Second Respondent

WARRUMBUNGLE SHIRE COUNCIL

Seventy Third Respondent

CENTENNIAL AIRLY PTY LIMITED ACN 078 693 722

Seventy Fourth Respondent

SHOALHAVEN COAL PTY LTD

Seventy Fifth Respondent

SITEGOAL PTY LTD

Seventy Sixth Respondent

WALKER QUARRIES PTY LTD

Seventy Seventh Respondent

JAMES BALLAS

Seventy Eighth Respondent

ANNE MARGARET BLAMEY

Seventy Ninth Respondent

CHRISTOPHER JOHN BLAMEY

Eightieth Respondent

LIONEL BRAITHWAITE

Eighty First Respondent

WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN

Eighty Second Respondent

JANE BURSILL

Eighty Third Respondent

DAVID LEE CLARKE OF PH CLARKE & SON

Eighty Fourth Respondent

LEIGH JOHN DESREAUX

Eighty Fifth Respondent

HEATHER GEORGE

Eighty Sixth Respondent

ANTHONY GIBSON

Eighty Seventh Respondent

PETER RONALD GRIEVE

Eighty Eighth Respondent

ALAN LOVELL HEATH

Eighty Ninth Respondent

KD FOLPP P/L

Ninetieth Respondent

RACHELLE MCMAHON

Ninety First Respondent

RONALD CHARLES MILTON

Ninety Second Respondent

HENRY WILLIAM PEARCE

Ninety Third Respondent

LINDSEY PIGGOTT

Ninety Fourth Respondent

JOYCE MILDRED PURTLE

Ninety Fifth Respondent

GREGORY JAMES ROHR

Ninety Sixth Respondent

TIMOTHY JOHN ROHR

Ninety Seventh Respondent

DIANA LUCY RUTTER

Ninety Eighth Respondent

KEITH LAWRENCE RUTTER

Ninety Ninth Respondent

PAULYNE MAY SANDER

One Hundredth Respondent

ROBYN PEARL SMITH

One Hundred First Respondent

SALVATORE SPANO

One Hundred Second Respondent

AMANDA CAROLINE SEE STEWART

One Hundred Third Respondent

GAY SUMMERS

One Hundred Fourth Respondent

SUNTALA PTY LTD

One Hundred Fifth Respondent

MICHAEL ANDREW SUTTOR

One Hundred Sixth Respondent

ALLAN ALBERT WALES

One Hundred Seventh Respondent

WIDDEN STUD PTY LTD

One Hundred Eighth

RYLSTONE KANDOS ANGLERS CLUB INC

Respondent

One Hundred Ninth Respondent

WALLERAWANG BRANCH OF THE CENTRAL ACCLIMATISATION SOCIETY

One Hundred Tenth Respondent

AUSTRALIAN RAIL TRACK CORPORATION ACN 081 455 754

One Hundred Eleventh Respondent

TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED ABN 33 051 775 556

One Hundred Twelfth Respondent

NSW ELECTRICITY NETWORKS OPERATIONS PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE NSW ELECTRICITY NETWORKS OPERATIONS TRUST ACN 609 169 959 (TRANSGRID)

One Hundred Thirteenth Respondent

COOYAL PARK RESERVE TRUST R120102

One Hundred Fourteenth Respondent

DUNEDOO SHOWGROUND TRUST RESERVE NO R83113

One Hundred Fifteenth Respondent

OLINDA PUBLIC RECREATION RESERVE TRUST

One Hundred Sixteenth Respondent

EVELYN MARGARET WATSON

ASSISTED DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Applicant WENDY LEWIS

Applicant

MAVIS AGNEW

Applicant

MARTIN DELAUNEY

Applicant

WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI #7

Respondent

KEITH KEMP

Respondent

BRADLEY ROBERT BLISS

Respondent

JOHN THOMAS RILEY

Respondent

WAYNE ALFRED CARR

Respondent

WELLINGTON VALLEY WIRADJURI ABORIGINAL CORPORATION

Details
AGLC
Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People #7 v Attorney General of New South Wales [2019] FCA 1177
Case
[2019] FCA 1177
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People #7, represented by NTSCORP Limited, initiated proceedings against the Attorney General of New South Wales concerning a claim of native title. The dispute revolves around the recognition of traditional rights and interests of the Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People over certain lands in New South Wales. Lithgow City Council has also been implicated in the proceedings, necessitating its inclusion as a party respondent. The Federal Court was tasked with determining whether to join the council as a respondent, and to consider a proposed mediation process aimed at resolving the disputed issues.

The central legal issues before the court were whether Lithgow City Council should be joined as a respondent in the proceedings and whether the proposed mediation process should proceed as planned. The court had to consider the potential benefits of mediation in resolving the dispute, as well as the implications for the parties if the mediation process were to be delayed. Additionally, the court had to assess the merits of the applicant's arguments against the proposed mediation timeline.

In reaching its decision, the court held that it was in the interest of all parties to proceed with the mediation process, as it could potentially narrow the disputed issues and reduce the need for extensive and costly litigation. The court ruled that Lithgow City Council should be joined as a respondent, finding that its involvement was necessary to address the comprehensive scope of the native title claim. The court also determined that the mediation process should not be delayed and set a timeline for its commencement and conclusion, with the Registrar to provide a report to the Court. Furthermore, the court mandated a series of subsequent procedural steps, including a progress report and a case management hearing, to ensure the mediation process and the broader proceedings remained on track.

The orders made by the court include the joining of Lithgow City Council as a party respondent, the referral of the matter to further mediation, the establishment of a mediation timeline, the requirement for a mediation report, the filing of a progress report by the applicant, and the scheduling of a case management hearing. The parties retain the liberty to restore the matter on short notice, ensuring flexibility in the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Lithgow City Council be joined as a party to the proceedings under s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

2. Pursuant to section 86B(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), this matter is referred for further mediation between the applicant, NTSCORP Limited and the active Indigenous Respondents by a Registrar of the Court.

3. The further mediation is to be commence by 16 September 2019 and conclude by 21 November 2019.

4. The Registrar is to provide a mediation report to the Court by 22 November 2019.

5. The applicant to file a progress report by 4 December 2019.

6. The matter is to be listed case management hearing on 11 December 2019.

7. The parties have liberty to restore on 48 hours’ notice.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Mr Robinson has not persuaded me that the proposed further mediation process should be delayed. Mr Robinson has between now and 16 September 2019 (the earliest point from which the proposed mediation can commence), to attend to the matters he describes. It is in everyone’s interest that the mediation process not be delayed any further because it has the prospect of narrowing the disputed issues and reducing the scope for costly contested legal proceedings.Conclusion For these reasons, an order will be made joining Lithgow City Council as a respondent in the proceeding and orders will be made in relation to the proposed mediation.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.