Waratah-Wynyard Council

Case [2024] FWCA 4443


[2024] FWCA 4443

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Waratah-Wynyard Council

(AG2024/4611)

WARATAH-WYNYARD COUNCIL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Local government administration

COMMISSIONER REDFORD

MELBOURNE, 16 DECEMBER 2024

Application for approval of the Waratah-Wynyard Council Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Waratah-Wynyard Council Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Waratah-Wynyard Council. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

Undertakings

  1. In response to several issues raised with Waratah-Wynyard Council in relation to its application, it has provided written undertakings, a copy of which are attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement. 

  1. The undertakings relate to:  

a.Definition of a shift worker

Relationship with the National Employment Standards.

  1. Clause 1.5 of the Agreement provides that the National Employment Standards (NES) applies to employees covered by the agreement except where the agreement provides a more favourable outcome (NES precedence clause). On this basis, I am satisfied that the apparent inconsistencies with the NES outlined below do not prevent the approval of this agreement:   

  1. Clause 12.1(d) of the Agreement provides for the withholding of monies in circumstances where an employee has given insufficient notice of resignation. Clause 12.1(d) provides that in these circumstances, the employer “has the right to withhold monies due to the employee to a maximum amount equal to the amount the employee would have received for the period of notice not given”. This clause appears to permit the employer to deduct monies from employee’s entitlements under the NES (such as notice of termination, accrued but unused annual leave or long service leave on termination). Accordingly, this clause may be inconsistent with Chapter 2 Part 2.2 Division 2 of the Act however, when read in conjunction with the NES precedence clause (clause 8(a)) will have no effect to the extent of any inconsistency.

Consideration

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical & Services Union Vic/Tas Authorities & Services Branch (ASU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the ASU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from Wednesday 1 January 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE527201  PR782372>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Waratah-Wynyard Council [2024] FWCA 4443
Case
[2024] FWCA 4443
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Waratah-Wynyard Council applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of their Enterprise Agreement 2025. The application involved various terms and conditions of employment for council employees, including wages, working hours, leave provisions, and other employment-related matters. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the proposed agreement met the legal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly concerning minimum entitlements, and if it provided for the fair and efficient operation of the council. The Commission examined the content of the agreement to ensure it did not undermine the minimum standards set by the Act, such as wage rates, maximum weekly hours, and provisions for leave. Additionally, the Commission assessed whether the agreement included provisions that were necessary for the effective management of council operations.

The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed Enterprise Agreement met the necessary legal standards. The agreement provided for fair wages and conditions that aligned with the minimum entitlements required by the Fair Work Act. The Commission noted that the agreement included provisions that ensured the efficient and effective operation of the council, balancing the interests of both the employer and the employees. The Commission approved the Waratah-Wynyard Council Enterprise Agreement 2025, confirming its compliance with the relevant legislative framework.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Waratah-Wynyard Council Enterprise Agreement 2025, effective from the date of the decision. The approval ensures that the agreement legally governs the terms and conditions of employment for council employees, providing a balanced approach to the rights and obligations of both parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.