Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wang v Abdel-Messih;; Abdel-Messih v Wang [2017] NSWCATCD 70 Hearing dates: 21 July 2017 Decision date: 25 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: P French, General Member Decision: In RT 17/14436 and RT 17/19334 (the landlord’s applications)
Consent orders made on 21 July 2017
1. By consent, the Residential Tenancy Agreement is terminated immediately and possession is given to the landlord on the date of termination.
2. By consent, the order for possession is suspended to 25 July 2017.
3. By consent, the tenant is to pay the landlord an occupation fee at the rate of $154.29 per day from the day after the date of termination, namely 22 July 2017 until the date vacant possession is given to the landlord.
4. By consent, within 60 days of the date for possession of the premises specified in these orders, the landlord may request the relisting of these applications to determine the amount of the occupation fee owing.NOTATION made on 21 July 2017
The Tribunal notes that the parties have also agreed that the landlord and the landlord’s Managing Agent will not list the tenant on any residential tenancy data base.
Order made by determination on 11 August 2017
5. The tenant, Bishoy Abdel-Messih, Unit 5605/93 Liverpool Street Sydney 2000 NSW Australia is to pay the landlord, Le Dong Wang, c/- Yueh Ying Chiu trading as Property Square Realty Suite 1 Level 7 377-383 Sussex Street Sydney 2000 NSW Australia the sum of $15,000.00 immediately.
In matter number RT 17/16177 (the tenant’s application)Order made by determination on 26 July 2017
6. The tenant’s request for leave to file additional evidence and or submissions after the conclusion of the final hearing of this application is refused.
Order made by determination on 11 August 2017
7. The application is dismissed.
Catchwords: RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES – landlord’s application under section 87 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 for a termination order for breach of the residential tenancy agreement – keeping of a dog at the residential premises – landlord’s application under section 87 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 for a termination order for breach of the residential tenancy agreement – non-payment of rent in accordance with the residential tenancy agreement – tenant’s application under sections 75(2), 187 and 190 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 for compensation for damage and loss allegedly incurred as a result of the landlord’s alleged breach of the residential tenancy agreement in unreasonably withholding consent to the sub-letting of the residential premises Category: Principal judgment Parties: Le Dong Wang (applicant/cross respondent-landlord)
Bishoy Abdel-Messih (respondent/cross applicant - tenant)Representation: Bishoy Abdel-Messih in person
Susan Chiu, Managing Agent for Landlord Le Dong Wang
File Number(s): RT 17/ 14436; RT 17/16177; RT 17/19334 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISIOn
-
There are three applications before the Tribunal in these proceedings.
-
The first application in time (RT 17/14436) is an application made by Le Dong Wang (the landlord)…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Wang v Abdel-Messih;; Abdel-Messih v Wang and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] NSWCATCD 70
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal found that the tenant had breached the tenancy agreement by keeping a dog and by failing to pay rent. The Tribunal also found that the landlord had breached the agreement by unreasonably withholding consent to subletting, which resulted in the tenant incurring costs to relocate. However, the Tribunal dismissed the tenant's claim for compensation for damages, finding that the tenant had failed to prove that the landlord's actions had caused the alleged damage. The Tribunal ordered that the tenancy be terminated and possession be given to the landlord, with the tenant paying an occupation fee until the landlord regained possession. The Tribunal also ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $15,000 in compensation for non-payment of rent. The Tribunal refused the tenant's request to file additional evidence and dismissed the tenant's application for compensation for damages.
Orders
Orders of the court
In RT 17/14436 and RT 17/19334 (the landlord’s applications)
Consent orders made on 21 July 2017
1. By consent, the Residential Tenancy Agreement is terminated immediately and possession is given to the landlord on the date of termination.
2. By consent, the order for possession is suspended to 25 July 2017.
3. By consent, the tenant is to pay the landlord an occupation fee at the rate of $154.29 per day from the day after the date of termination, namely 22 July 2017 until the date vacant possession is given to the landlord.
4. By consent, within 60 days of the date for possession of the premises specified in these orders, the landlord may request the relisting of these applications to determine the amount of the occupation fee owing.
NOTATION made on 21 July 2017
The Tribunal notes that the parties have also agreed that the landlord and the landlord’s Managing Agent will not list the tenant on any residential tenancy data base.
Order made by determination on 11 August 2017
5. The tenant, Bishoy Abdel-Messih, Unit 5605/93 Liverpool Street Sydney 2000 NSW Australia is to pay the landlord, Le Dong Wang, c/- Yueh Ying Chiu trading as Property Square Realty Suite 1 Level 7 377-383 Sussex Street Sydney 2000 NSW Australia the sum of $15,000.00 immediately.
In matter number RT 17/16177 (the tenant’s application)
Order made by determination on 26 July 2017
6. The tenant’s request for leave to file additional evidence and or submissions after the conclusion of the final hearing of this application is refused.
Order made by determination on 11 August 2017
7. The application is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.