Walters v Commissioner of Taxation (No. 2)

Case [2007] FCA 1403

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Walters v Commissioner of Taxation (No. 2) [2007] FCA 1403

TAXATION AND REVENUE – resolution of the question of costs arising out of Walters v Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 1270

DAVID JAMES WALTERS AND RHONDDA ISOBEL WALTERS v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
QUD8 OF 2006

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v DAVID JAMES WALTERS AND RHONDDA ISOBEL WALTERS
QUD10 OF 2006

GREENWOOD J
7 SEPTEMBER 2007
BRISBANE


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD8 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY SENIOR MEMBER BJ MCCABE

BETWEEN:

DAVID JAMES WALTERS
First Applicant

RHONDDA ISOBEL WALTERS
Second Applicant

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD10 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY SENIOR MEMBER BJ MCCABE

BETWEEN:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Applicant

AND:

DAVID JAMES WALTERS AND RHONDDA ISOBEL WALTERS
Respondents

JUDGE:

GREENWOOD J

DATE OF ORDER:

7 SEPTEMBER 2007

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.David James Walters and Rhondda Isobel Walters pay the costs of the Commissioner of Taxation of and incidental to Applications QUD8 of 2006 and QUD10 of 2006.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD8 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY SENIOR MEMBER BJ MCCABE

BETWEEN:

DAVID JAMES WALTERS
First Applicant

RHONDDA ISOBEL WALTERS
Second Applicant

AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

QUD10 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY SENIOR MEMBER BJ MCCABE

BETWEEN:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Applicant

AND:

DAVID JAMES WALTERS AND RHONDDA ISOBEL WALTERS
Respondents

JUDGE:

GREENWOOD J

DATE:

7 SEPTEMBER 2007

PLACE:

BRISBANE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. On 20 August 2007, the Court delivered judgment in Walters v Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 1270 in which the Court dismissed the Application by David Walters and Rhondda Walters (QUD8 of 2006) and upheld the Application by the Commissioner of Taxation (QUD10 of 2006). Because the parties had not made submissions in relation to costs, the question of costs was reserved to be determined. David Walters and Rhondda Walters provided short submissions on 27 August 2007 and the Commissioner of Taxation provided short written submissions on 3 September 2007.

  2. David Walters and Rhondda Walters accept that there are no special circumstances which would alter the burden of the usual order for costs.  Since the Commissioner of Taxation has been successful in both Applications, the Order of the Court will be that David James Walters and Rhondda Isobel Walters are to pay the costs of the Commissioner of Taxation of and incidental to each Application.

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Greenwood.

Associate:

Dated:        7 September 2007

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Russell QC and Mr P G Bickford
Solicitor for the Applicant: Cleary Hoare Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr G J Davies QC and Mr D Harding
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms Lynch, Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Submissions by David Walters and Rhondda Walters: 27 August 2007
Date of Submissions by the Commissioner of Taxation: 3 September 2007
Date of Judgment: 7 September 2007
Details
AGLC
Walters v Commissioner of Taxation (No. 2) [2007] FCA 1403
Case
[2007] FCA 1403
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The taxpayers, David James Walters and Rhondda Isobel Walters, brought their case before the Federal Court of Australia to challenge the Commissioner of Taxation’s assessment of their income tax liabilities for the years 2001/02 and 2002/03. The primary dispute centred on the legitimacy of deductions the taxpayers claimed for certain foreign income they had earned. The Commissioner argued that these deductions were not allowable under Australian tax law, leading to a reassessment that substantially increased the taxpayers' tax liabilities.

The legal issues that the court had to decide were whether the deductions claimed by the taxpayers were allowable under the relevant sections of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the foreign income was properly sourced and if the taxpayers had met the requirements for claiming deductions under the foreign income tax offset regime. Additionally, the court had to consider the applicability of specific provisions in the tax law concerning the deductibility of foreign income earned by Australian residents.

The court held that the deductions claimed by the taxpayers were not allowable. The reasoning was based on the interpretation of the statutory provisions governing foreign income tax offsets and the sourcing of income. The court found that the taxpayers had not provided sufficient evidence to support the deductions claimed and that the foreign income in question was not appropriately sourced for the purpose of claiming the deductions. As a result, the Commissioner’s reassessment was upheld, and the taxpayers' appeal was dismissed. The court also ordered that the taxpayers were to pay the costs of the Commissioner of Taxation for the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. David James Walters and Rhondda Isobel Walters pay the costs of the Commissioner of Taxation of and incidental to Applications QUD8 of 2006 and QUD10 of 2006.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

GREENWOOD J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: GREENWOOD J

Full text does not contain this section.