Wallace v Trade Credits Ltd

Case [1983] FCA 315


Re: JOHN VINCENT WALLACE
And: TRADE CREDITS LIMITED (1983) 72 FLR 252
No. G92 of 1983
Bankruptcy

COURT

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
Bowen C.J.(1), McGregor(1) and Neaves(1) JJ.
CATCHWORDS

Bankruptcy - judgment for debt against guarantors - judgment for possession of land of two guarantors - bankruptcy notice issued against one other guarantor - whether judgment against the one other guarantor stayed by execution of judgment for possession against two guarantors - whether bankruptcy notice should issue against a judgment debtor where there has been execution against other judgment debtors.

Bankruptcy Act 1966 s.40(1) (g), s41(3) (b)

Bankruptcy - Judgment for debt against guarantors - Judgment for possession of land of two guarantors - Bankruptcy notice issued against a third guarantor - Whether judgment against the third other guarantor stayed by execution of judgment for possession against first two guarantors - Whether bankruptcy notice should issue against a judgment debtor where there has been execution against other judgment debtors - Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 40(1)(g), 41(3)(b).

HEADNOTE

The appellant was one of five guarantors to a loan granted by the respondent to World Cup Rodeo Pty Ltd.

Security for the loan was also given by two of the guarantors over three parcels of land.

The borrower defaulted in repayment of moneys due under the loan agreement and the guarantors failed to pay such money to the respondent.

On 16 July 1982 judgment was entered in the Supreme Court of New South Wales for the respondent against the five guarantors, including the appellant, for the debt. The judgment remained unsatisfied.

In August 1982 the respondent obtained possession of the three parcels of land, and caused to be issued a bankruptcy notice to the appellant.

The appellant applied to have the notice set aside. His application was rejected by a single judge and he appealed to the Full Court.

He argued that by entering into possession of the lands and selling parts of them, the respondent had taken a step equivalent to a procedure of execution and that such execution being still in progress was a bar to further execution such as the issue of the bankruptcy notice.

Held: (1) The so called act of execution was against the property of the other guarantors, whereas the bankruptcy notice was against the appellant.

(2) The issue of a bankruptcy notice is not itself a form of execution.

(3) Execution against the mortgagors had not deprived the appellant of assets thereby preventing him paying the judgment debt and accordingly there was no ground for holding that execution on the judgment precluded the issue of a bankruptcy notice.

(4) Appeal dismissed.

Re A Bankruptcy Notice (1898) 1 QB 383; and Re Bond; Ex parte Capital and Counties Bank Ltd (1911) 2 KB 988, referred to.

HEARING

Sydney, 1983, October 31; November 1. #DATE 1:11:1983

R. Cameron, for the appellant.

P. Evans, for the respondent. Cur. adv. vult.

Solicitors for the appellant: Thomas F.…

Continue reading Wallace v Trade Credits Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Wallace, John Vincent v Trade Credits Ltd [1983] FCA 315 ((1983) 72 FLR 252)
Case
[1983] FCA 315
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Wallace v Trade Credits Ltd involved a dispute regarding the execution of judgments against guarantors of a debt. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The primary issue was whether a bankruptcy notice could be issued against a guarantor who was subject to a judgment for debt, where other guarantors had already been subject to a judgment for the possession of land. The appellant, Wallace, argued that the execution against the other guarantors should stay any further execution against him. The respondent, Trade Credits Ltd, contended that the issuance of a bankruptcy notice was appropriate given the outstanding judgment debt.

The court examined the legal principles surrounding judgments and execution orders. It considered whether the execution of a judgment for possession against certain guarantors could have the effect of staying the execution of a judgment for debt against other guarantors. The court also assessed whether a bankruptcy notice should issue against a judgment debtor where there had already been execution against other judgment debtors. After reviewing the applicable statutes and case law, the court concluded that the execution of the judgment for possession did not stay the execution of the judgment for debt, and that the issuance of a bankruptcy notice was not precluded by the prior execution against other guarantors.

The Supreme Court of Victoria dismissed the appeal, holding that the respondent was entitled to issue a bankruptcy notice against Wallace. The court found that the execution of the judgment for possession against the other guarantors did not have the effect of staying the execution of the judgment for debt against Wallace. Consequently, the court upheld the respondent's right to pursue bankruptcy proceedings against Wallace. The appeal was dismissed, and Wallace was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The appellant is to pay the respondent's costs.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.