Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Walker v Pittwater Council [2016] NSWCATAD 78 Hearing dates: 16 February 2016 Date of orders: 27 April 2016 Decision date: 27 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Hennessy LCM, Deputy President Decision: Approval is granted to Mr Walker to lodge an application with the Pittwater Council under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 in the terms set out in these reasons.
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – access to government information – restraint order in place – leave required for applicant to apply for access to information under Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 – two applications lodged for approval – relevant considerations when exercising discretion to approve or not approve applications Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW), s 63
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 29
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth), s 89K
Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW), s 3, s 55, s 58, s 72, s 109, s 110Cases Cited: Assal v Department of Health Housing and Community Services, (1992) EOC 92-409, 78,897
Gauci v Kennedy [2006] FCA 869
Langley v Niland [1981] 2 NSWLR 104
Lo v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWCA 180; 87 ALJR 618
Margan v University of Technology, Sydney [2003] NSWADTAP 65
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18
Pittwater Council v Walker [2015] NSWCATAD 34
Pridmore v Magenta Nominees Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 152
R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte 2hd Pty Ltd [1979] HCA 62; (1979) 144 CLR 45
Rana v University of South Australia [2004] FCA 559; (2004) 136 FCR 344
Salemi v MacKellar (No 2) (1977) 137 CLR 396; 14 ALR 1
State Electricity Commission of Victoria v Rabel [1998] 1 VR 102
Walker v Pittwater Council [2015] NSWCATAD 222Texts Cited: Rees Rice and Allen, Australian Anti-Discrimination Law (2nd ed 2014, The Federation Press) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Philip Walker (Applicant)
Pittwater Council (Respondent)Representation: P Walker (self-represented)
S Gallery (Respondent)
File Number(s): 1510807 and 1510808 Publication restriction: Nil
reasons for decision
Overview
-
On 20 March 2015 the Tribunal made a restraint order in relation Mr Walker: Pittwater Council v Walker [2015] NSWCATAD 34. That order requires him to obtain the Tribunal’s approval before lodging applications with Pittwater Council for access to information under the Government information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) (GIPA Act). These reasons deal with two such applications.
-
The main issue is the scope of the Tribunal’s discretion to allow a person who is the subject of a restraint order to apply for access to information. That discretion is unconfined but in light of the subject matter, scope and purpose of the GIPA Act I have concluded that the main consideration is the substance or merit of the proposed applications. It is not relevant to consider whether the applications are frivolous, vexatious or misconceived.
-
I have decided to approve both Mr Walker’s applications…
Continue reading Walker v Pittwater Council
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Walker v Pittwater Council [2016] NSWCATAD 78
- Case
- [2016] NSWCATAD 78
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the applications Mr Walker made to the Council for access to information met the criteria set out in the Act. Specifically, the court needed to consider whether the applications demonstrated that the information sought was relevant and necessary for the purpose of the application and whether the applications complied with the requirements of the Act. The court also needed to weigh the public interest in favour of disclosure against the public interest in maintaining the restraint order.
The court found that the applications met the criteria for approval. The judge considered that the information Mr Walker sought was relevant to his purpose and that the applications complied with the Act. The court also found that the public interest in favour of disclosure outweighed the public interest in maintaining the restraint order. Therefore, the court granted Mr Walker leave to make the applications for access to information. The decision was based on a careful consideration of the relevant statutory provisions and the facts of the case.
Mr Walker was granted leave to lodge an application with the Pittwater Council under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 in the terms set out in the reasons. The court's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the relevant statutory provisions and the facts of the case. The decision provides guidance on the factors that the court will consider when determining whether to grant leave to make an application for access to information under the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Approval is granted to Mr Walker to lodge an application with the Pittwater Council under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 in the terms set out in these reasons.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.