Legal Research
Cases
Walker v Munnecke (No 2)

Walker v Munnecke (No 2)

Case [2025] VCC 500

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Walker v Munnecke (No 2) [2025] VCC 500
Case: [2025] VCC 500
Decision Date: 28 April 2025

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Walker v Munnecke (No 2) [2025] VCC 500

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Groves v Matt O'Connor and Associates Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2015] NSWSC 817
Citation 1

…ses, no issue of timing was taken with Calderbank offers open for seven days: for example, see Groves v Matt O’Connor & Associates Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 817 and Roland Ofria v Robert William Cameron (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 242. I note that in the particular circumstances of Nominal Defendant v Dighton (No 2) [201…
Jones v Trad (No 3) [2013] NSWCA 463
Citation 2

…In contrast, in Jones v Trad (No 3) [2013] NSWCA 463 [47]-[48], seven days was considered too short. Notably, the hearing of the relevant appeal was five months away at the time the offer was made – there was no need for the offer period to be so short. In some cases, no issue of timing was taken with Calderbank of…
Mischel Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) v Mischel [2013] VSCA 375
Citation 3

…n application for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal in Mischel Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) v Mischel [2013] VSCA 375.) 6The defendant addressed each of these factors in her written submissions, setting out the reasons why she contended that the factors militated in favour of a conclusion of unreas…
Mainteck Services Pty Limited v Stein Heurtey SA and Stein Heurtey Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1165
Citation 4 (Para 17)

…of their prospects of success: Texxcon Pty Ltd v Austexx Corp Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] VSC 343 at [17]. In Mainteck Services Pty Ltd v Stein Heurtey SA [2013] NSWSC 1165 at [17], seven days was considered reasonable. Sackar J stated at [17]: ...I am mindful that the offer was open for only seven days. It is clear from…
Nominal Defendant v Dighton (No 2) [2012] SASCFC 97
Citation 5 (Para 11)

…Roland Ofria v Robert William Cameron (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 242. I note that in the particular circumstances of Nominal Defendant v Dighton (No 2) [2012] SASCFC 97 at [11], a Calderbank offer was made by a respondent the day before the appeal, which resulted in the Court giving the respondent costs of the hearing on…
BHPB Freight Pty Ltd v Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd (No 4) [2009] FCA 1448
Citation 6 (Para 13)

…rejecting a Calderbank offer if the offer is unclear or imprecise.[16] [16]See eg BHPB Freight Pty Ltd v Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd (No 4) (2009) 263 ALR 63 at [13]. 38The first point raised by the plaintiffs in this context appears to be incorrect. The plaintiffs’ submissions did not identify the “two differ…
Ofria v Cameron (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 242
Citation 7

…seven days: for example, see Groves v Matt O’Connor & Associates Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 817 and Roland Ofria v Robert William Cameron (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 242. I note that in the particular circumstances of Nominal Defendant v Dighton (No 2) [2012] SASCFC 97 at [11], a Calderbank offer was made by a respondent…
Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd v Salmon [2007] NSWCA 322
Citation 8

…ardi v KP Hicks (No 2) [2018] VCC 1280; Hewitt v Count Financial Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 405; Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd v Salmon [2007] NSWCA 322…
Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298
Citation 9

…dgment in offeror’s favour – whether offer unclear Cases Cited: Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435; JJJP Properties Pty Ltd v Peacock (Costs) [2024] VCC 740; Oliver Hume (Vic) Pty Ltd v Santa Monica (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 1239; Gagliardi v KP Hicks (No…
Texxcon Pty Ltd v Austexx Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] VSC 343
Citation 10 (Para 17)

…as the parties have a better opportunity to make an informed assessment of their prospects of success: Texxcon Pty Ltd v Austexx Corp Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] VSC 343 at [17]. In Mainteck Services Pty Ltd v Stein Heurtey SA [2013] NSWSC 1165 at [17], seven days was considered reasonable. Sackar J stated at [17]: ..…
Mischel v Mischel Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2012] VSC 421
Citation 11 (Para 24)

…as seems to the Court appropriate in all the circumstances.[3] [3] Mischel v Mischel Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2012] VSC 421 at [24]. (An application for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal in Mischel Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) v Mischel [2013] VSCA 375.) 6The defendant addressed each of t…
MT Associates Pty Ltd v Aqua-Max Pty Ltd (No 3) [2000] VSC 163
Citation 12 (Para 121)

…or less has been held to be sufficient. It depends on the facts. In M.T. Associates Pty Ltd v Aqua-Max Pty Ltd & Anor (No. 3) [2000] VSC 163 at [121]-[122] Gillard J considered a Calderbank offer open for six days to be reasonable. He said at [121]-[122]: This litigation had been on foot by 15 November 1999 for s…
Walker v Munnecke [2025] VCC 267
Citation 13

…defined terms below, those terms should be understood as having the meaning ascribed to them in the Principal Reasons. [1] Walker v Munnecke [2025] VCC 267. 2The parties have each filed written submissions dated 3 April 2025. There is no dispute that orders should be made dismissing the plaintiffs’ claim. The on…
JJJP Properties Pty Ltd v Colin Peacock (Costs) [2024] VCC 740
Citation 14

…ed: Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435; JJJP Properties Pty Ltd v Peacock (Costs) [2024] VCC 740; Oliver Hume (Vic) Pty Ltd v Santa Monica (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 1239; Gagliardi v KP Hicks (No 2) [2018] VCC 1280; Hewitt v Count Financial Ltd (No 2) […
Gagliardi v KP Hicks (No 2) [2018] VCC 1280
Citation 15

…ock (Costs) [2024] VCC 740; Oliver Hume (Vic) Pty Ltd v Santa Monica (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 1239; Gagliardi v KP Hicks (No 2) [2018] VCC 1280; Hewitt v Count Financial Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 405; Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd v Salmon [2007] NSWCA 322…
Oliver Hume (Vic) Pty Ltd v Santa Monica (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 1239
Citation 16

…05) 13 VR 435; JJJP Properties Pty Ltd v Peacock (Costs) [2024] VCC 740; Oliver Hume (Vic) Pty Ltd v Santa Monica (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 1239; Gagliardi v KP Hicks (No 2) [2018] VCC 1280; Hewitt v Count Financial Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 405; Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd v Salmon [2007] NSWCA 322…
Hewitt v Count Financial Limited (No.2) [2017] VCC 405
Citation 17

…v Santa Monica (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 1239; Gagliardi v KP Hicks (No 2) [2018] VCC 1280; Hewitt v Count Financial Ltd (No 2) [2017] VCC 405; Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd v Salmon [2007] NSWCA 322…

AI Chat coming soon