W.H.Heck & Sons Pty Ltd T/A Rocky Point Sugar Mill

Case

[2015] FWCA 7793

13 NOVEMBER 2015

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2015] FWCA 7793
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

W.H.Heck & Sons Pty Ltd T/A Rocky Point Sugar Mill
(AG2015/5076)

ROCKY POINT SUGAR MILL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Sugar industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY

BRISBANE, 13 NOVEMBER 2015

Application for variation of the Rocky Point Sugar Mill Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1] W H Heck & Sons Pty Ltd T/A Rocky Point Sugar Mill applies for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Rocky Point Sugar Mill Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The Australian Workers’ Union, the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, have each given notice under s.183 of the Act that these organisations want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] On 13 November 2015 an undertaking was provided by the Employer. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Employer’s undertaking. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act I note that a copy of the undertaking is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement is approved, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 20 November 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 May 2017.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, AE416614  PR573894>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0