VWA v Venamis Group Pty Ltd and Lockwood (Ruling No 2)

Case [2011] VCC 976

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Chen v Chan [2009] VSCA 233
Citation 1

…iples to the making of an order for costs in circumstances where a proportionate order may be contemplated. J Forrest J stated: [7] [2011] VSC 41 [8] [2009] VSCA 233 “(1) The general rule is that costs should follow the event. Absent disqualifying conduct, the successful party should recover its costs even where i…
Investec Bank (Australia) Limited v Glodale Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 113
Citation 2

…establish issues which it pursued in its claim, although ultimately succeeding on the basis of another discrete head of claim. … .’” [5] [2009] VSCA 113 (14 May 2009) [6] Unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, 12926 of 1990, Eames J, 10 April 1995…
Joseph Street Pty Ltd v Tan (Costs Ruling) [2011] VSC 41
Citation 3

…the relevant principles to the making of an order for costs in circumstances where a proportionate order may be contemplated. J Forrest J stated: [7] [2011] VSC 41 [8] [2009] VSCA 233 “(1) The general rule is that costs should follow the event. Absent disqualifying conduct, the successful party should recover it…

AI Chat coming soon