Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Fox
[2009] HCA 35
Citation 1
…on their account in accordance with the principles in Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Fox. [38] [38] [2009] HCA 35 (2 September 2009). 67 On the material before me I am satisfied that ISPT delegated its duty as occupier to JLL. I found the submissions of Mr Grainger, who appeared on behalf of ISPT prior to settle…
Esso Australia Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority
[2000] VSCA 74
Citation 2
…over an employee to an occupier and that occupier had designed the way in which tasks were to be performed. [37] [2000] VSCA 74 (19 April 2000). 65 I agree with Mr Dyer’s submission that the system of work was the responsibility of the employer and there is no evidence that JLL played any role at all in directin…
Griffiths v Kerkemeyer
[1977] HCA 45
Citation 3
…e VWA adduced additional evidence from the worker on the issue of damages pursuant to the principles in Griffiths v Kerkemeyer[31] [31] (1977) 139 CLR 161.…
Jones v Dunkel
[1959] HCA 8
Citation 4
…ant to the principles of Jones v Dunkel[10] should be drawn against the VWA for failing to call Rachel Saracino. [10] (1959) 101 CLR 298.…
Victorian WorkCover Authority v Concept Hire Limited
[2009] VSC 194
Citation 5
…still have a statutory obligation to pay the worker because it is a statutory co-insured with the employer. [24] (2009) 24 VR 695 at paragraph 10. [25] At paragraph 6.…
Victorian WorkCover Authority v Prolift Fleet Management Pty Ltd
[2009] VSC 96
Citation 6
…ent multiplier rather than the six per cent applied in the worker’s proceeding.[35] [35] VWA v Prolift Fleet Management [2009] VSC 96, a decision of Kay J on 20 March 2009. 52 Accordingly, the future economic loss calculation is as follows: Loss of earning capacity at $854.10 per week using a multiplier of 196.9…
Korlevski v Lea Group North (Vic) Pty Ltd & Ors
[2011] VCC 1168
Citation 7
…e (Vic) Pty Limited (“JLL”), which was the manager of the shopping centre.[1] [1] Korlevski v Lea Group North (Vic) Pty Ltd & Ors [2011] VCC 1168, 26 August 2011. 3 In this proceeding, JLL is the first defendant. ISPT Pty Ltd (“ISPT”), the second defendant, was at all relevant times the owner of the shopping centr…
Webb v TAC
[2011] VCC 141
Citation 8
…ent to make amends for loss of injury to personal property, or as recompensed for some deprivation’.” [21] [21] [2011] VCC 141 (18 March 2010) at paragraph 68…