FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| VRSECKY v REAPER & ANOR | [2015] FCCA 32 |
| Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – Trustee seeking orders for partition sale of a property jointly owned by bankrupt and his wife – respondents asserting property wholly or substantially wholly bought with protected funds within meaning on s.116(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 – property bought in 2002 – bankrupt’s protected payments commencing in 2007 – all mortgage payments thereafter made from protected funds – half payments credited to wife – necessity for valuations in 2007 and 2014 in order to value bankrupt’s contribution pursuant to s.116(4) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. |
| Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966, ss.114, 116(3), 116(4), 153B, 178, 179 |
| Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 13 Turner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1996] FCA 1074 Re Manivilovski; Ex parte Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (1993) 117 ALR 537 Stankovic v Van Der Velde [2012] FCA 1436 |
| Applicant: | PETR VRSECKY (AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF BRETT VINCENT REAPER) |
| First Respondent: | BRETT VINCENT REAPER |
| Second Respondent: | SHARON FISHER |
| File Number: | MLG 931 of 2013 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Burchardt |
| Hearing date: | 13 November 2014 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 13 November 2014 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 10 February 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Ms Ballantyne |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Madgwicks |
| First Respondent: | In Person |
| Second Respondent: | In Person |
ORDERS
The parties do all such things as may be required to obtain a valuation of the property situated at and known as 12 The Esplanade, Narre Warren South, Victoria (“the property”):
(a)As at May 2007; and
(b)Currently.
The parties appoint a valuer by agreement, and failing agreement appointed by the President of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria, to value the property.
The Respondents to provide access to the property upon reasonable notice by the appointed valuer.
The parties confer and produce an agreed estimate of the mortgage on the property as at:
(a)May 2007; and
(b)Currently
The matter be listed for directions as soon as orders 1 to 4 have been complied with.
All extant applications be listed for trial before Judge Burchardt at 10.00am on 18 March 2015.
The Respondents file and serve any further Affidavits on or before 24 February 2015.
The Applicant file and serve any further Affidavits on or before 9 March 2015.
Any Affidavits in Reply be filed and served on or before 16 March 2015.
Costs be reserved.
There be liberty to apply.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT AT MELBOURNE |
MLG 931 of 2013
| PETR VRSECKY (AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF BRETT VINCENT REAPER) |
Applicant
And
| BRETT VINCENT REAPER |
First Respondent
| SHARON FISHER |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
By an amended application, which has been the subject of some confusion from time to time, but ultimately filed in court on 13 November 2014, the applicant trustee of the bankrupt estate of the first respondent seeks orders for the partition and sale of the home of the respondents. The trustee…
Continue reading Vrsecky v Reaper & Anor
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Vrsecky v Reaper & Anor [2015] FCCA 32
- Case
- [2015] FCCA 32
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court was to determine the extent to which the bankrupt's interest in the jointly owned property was divisible property available to his trustee. This involved assessing whether payments made towards the property, particularly after the commencement of protected payments in 2007, were derived from protected funds, and how to value the bankrupt's contribution to the property in light of section 116(4) of the *Bankruptcy Act 1966* (Cth).
Judge Burchardt reasoned that to properly assess the bankrupt's divisible interest, it was necessary to ascertain the value of the property at two key points in time: May 2007, when protected payments commenced, and the current date. This valuation would allow for the calculation of the bankrupt's contribution, considering that half of the mortgage payments made from protected funds were credited to the wife. The Court also required an estimate of the outstanding mortgage balance at these respective dates.
Consequently, the Court ordered that valuations of the property be obtained as at May 2007 and currently, with the parties to agree on a valuer or have one appointed by the President of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria. The respondents were directed to provide access for the valuation. The parties were also to confer and produce an agreed estimate of the mortgage on the property at the same two dates. The matter was adjourned for further directions once these orders were complied with, with a trial date set for 18 March 2015, and costs reserved.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The parties do all such things as may be required to obtain a valuation of the property situated at and known as 12 The Esplanade, Narre Warren South, Victoria (“the property”):
(a) As at May 2007; and
(b) Currently.
2. The parties appoint a valuer by agreement, and failing agreement appointed by the President of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria, to value the property.
3. The Respondents to provide access to the property upon reasonable notice by the appointed valuer.
4. The parties confer and produce an agreed estimate of the mortgage on the property as at:
(a) May 2007; and
(b) Currently
5. The matter be listed for directions as soon as orders 1 to 4 have been complied with.
6. All extant applications be listed for trial before Judge Burchardt at 10.00am on 18 March 2015.
7. The Respondents file and serve any further Affidavits on or before 24 February 2015.
8. The Applicant file and serve any further Affidavits on or before 9 March 2015.
9. Any Affidavits in Reply be filed and served on or before 16 March 2015.
10. Costs be reserved.
11. There be liberty to apply.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.