von Arnim v Ellison
Case
•
[2006] FCAFC 49
•11 APRIL 2006
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
von Arnim v Ellison [2006] FCAFC 49
[2006] FCAFC 49
11 APRIL 2006
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Dr von Arnim appealed against the trial judge’s dismissal of his claim for damages for false imprisonment and breach of duty. The respondents on appeal were the Commonwealth of Australia, the Minister for Justice and Customs of the Commonwealth of Australia, and the Australian Federal Police. The appeal was heard by the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. The central issue before the Court was whether the trial judge was correct to dismiss Dr von Arnim's claims for damages and to order him to pay the respondents' costs. Dr von Arnim argued that the trial judge erred in finding that there was sufficient evidence that the German warrant was valid and that he was an extraditable person. The Court found that the trial judge was correct in dismissing Dr von Arnim’s claims. The Court found that the evidence was sufficient to support the validity of the German warrant and that Dr von Arnim was an extraditable person. The Court also found that the trial judge was correct to order Dr von Arnim to pay the respondents' costs. The Court dismissed the appeal and ordered that Dr von Arnim pay the respondents' costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Extradition Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Extradition Request
-
Arrest Warrant
-
Extraditable Person
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
von Arnim v Ellison [2006] FCAFC 49
Most Recent Citation
Coates-Kelly v New Zealand [2022] FCAFC 131
Cases Citing This Decision
10
R v Cranston (No 3)
[2020] NSWSC 1103
Coates-Kelly v New Zealand
[2022] FCAFC 131
Cases Cited
21
Statutory Material Cited
0
von Arnim v Federal Republic of Germany (No 2)
[2005] FCA 662
Von Arnim v Federal Republic of Germany
[1999] FCA 1159
Cited Sections