Vivian (a pseudonym)

Case [2025] NSWCATGD 4


NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Vivian (a pseudonym) [2025] NSWCATGD 4
Hearing dates: 20 June 2025
Date of orders: 20 June 2025
Decision date: 20 June 2025
Jurisdiction:Guardianship Division
Before: V Taylor, Senior Member (Legal)
J McAuliffe, Senior Member (Professional)
P A Rutledge AM, General Member (Community)
Decision:

1. A guardianship order is made for Vivian.

2. Kathy of [Address removed for publication.] is appointed as the guardian.

3. Melissa of [Address removed for publication.] is appointed as the alternative guardian.

4. This is a continuing guardianship order for a period of six months from 20 June 2025.

5. This is a limited guardianship order giving the guardian custody of Vivian to the extent necessary to carry out the functions below.

FUNCTIONS: Kathy

6. Kathy has the following functions:

a) Travel

To make decisions about whether or not Vivian can travel to any place outside Australia.

b) Passport

To make a decision about whether or not the passport of Vivian should be surrendered to the guardian or some other authority the guardian nominates pending a decision by the guardian concerning travel.

CONDITION:

7. The condition of this order is:

a) Standard Condition

In exercising this role, the guardian shall take all reasonable steps to bring Vivian to an understanding of the issues and to obtain and consider their views before making significant decisions.

Catchwords:

GUARDIANSHIP – 32-year-old person with autism and borderline personality disorder – urgent guardianship order sought – person seeking to leave the country to Pakistan that evening – person opposed to guardianship order – evidence that travel to Pakistan is unsafe generally, and particularly in relation to person – concern over lack of supports in Pakistan – short-term guardianship order made for a period of 6 months with travel and passport functions only.

Legislation Cited:

Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 3(1)-(2), 4,14, 14(2), 17(1)

Cases Cited:

IF v IG [2004] NSWADTAP 3

Texts Cited:

None cited.

Category:Principal judgment
Parties:

001: Guardianship Application

Vivian (the person)
Andrea (applicant)
Melissa (joined party, proposed guardian)
Kathy (joined party, proposed guardian)
Public Guardian
Representation: None.
File Number(s): NCAT 2025/00235976
Publication restriction: Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify any person involved in the Tribunal’s proceedings: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 65.

REASONS FOR DECISION

What the Tribunal decided

  1. The Tribunal appointed Kathy as guardian and Melissa as alternative guardian, for a period of six months, to make decisions about:

  • whether or not Vivian can travel to any place outside of Australia; and

  • whether or not the passport of Vivian should be surrendered to the guardian or some other authority the guardian nominates, pending a decision by the guardian concerning travel;

as set out in the Tribunal’s order.

Background

  1. Vivian is 32 years old and prefers to be known as “Viv” and described with they/them pronouns. We will refer to them as such throughout these…

Continue reading Vivian (a pseudonym)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Vivian (a pseudonym) [2025] NSWCATGD 4
Case
[2025] NSWCATGD 4
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Vivian, a pseudonymous 32-year-old individual diagnosed with autism and borderline personality disorder, the court was presented with a pressing guardianship matter. The urgency stemmed from Vivian's intent to travel to Pakistan that very evening, which the applicant opposed due to concerns about the safety of the destination and the lack of support for Vivian there. The primary issue before the court was whether to grant an urgent guardianship order, specifically limiting it to travel and passport functions, to prevent Vivian from leaving the country.

The court had to balance Vivian's right to autonomy against the necessity to safeguard their well-being given the potential risks associated with travel to Pakistan. The evidence indicated that the general conditions in Pakistan, and more specifically the conditions relevant to Vivian, were unsafe. Furthermore, there was concern about the absence of support structures for Vivian in Pakistan. After weighing these factors, the court determined that a short-term guardianship order was warranted to protect Vivian's interests.

The court granted a continuing guardianship order for a period of six months, with Kathy and Melissa appointed as the primary and alternative guardians, respectively. This limited guardianship order specifically empowered the guardians to make decisions regarding Vivian's travel and the management of their passport. The court also imposed a condition requiring the guardian to ensure that Vivian understands the issues and to consider their views before making significant decisions. This decision was made to ensure that Vivian's autonomy and voice were respected within the constraints of the guardianship order.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. A guardianship order is made for Vivian.

2. Kathy of [Address removed for publication.] is appointed as the guardian.

3. Melissa of [Address removed for publication.] is appointed as the alternative guardian.

4. This is a continuing guardianship order for a period of six months from 20 June 2025.

5. This is a limited guardianship order giving the guardian custody of Vivian to the extent necessary to carry out the functions below.

FUNCTIONS: Kathy

6. Kathy has the following functions:

a) Travel

To make decisions about whether or not Vivian can travel to any place outside Australia.

b) Passport

To make a decision about whether or not the passport of Vivian should be surrendered to the guardian or some other authority the guardian nominates pending a decision by the guardian concerning travel.

CONDITION:

7. The condition of this order is:

a) Standard Condition

In exercising this role, the guardian shall take all reasonable steps to bring Vivian to an understanding of the issues and to obtain and consider their views before making significant decisions.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.