Vito Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited

[2016] HCASL 138

VITO ZEPINIC
v
CHATEAU CONSTRUCTIONS (AUST) LIMITED
[2016] HCASL 138
S86/2016

1. The proposed appeal concerns matters of practice and procedure and does not raise a question of general public importance sufficient to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal.  Special leave is refused.

2. Pursuant to r 41.10.5 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

V.M. Bell
17 June 2016 S.J. Gageler