Virgin Advertising v National Builders Group

Case [2009] VCC 153

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Virgin Advertising v National Builders Group [2009] VCC 153

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon [1993] HCA 4
Citation 1

…e a reflection of the benefit in fact received. [5] Principles confirmed and explained in Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 111 ALR 289. [6] David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 66 ALJR 768 at 779. 23 The difficulty in assessing whether there was a contract for an “entire and indivisible” promise in this…
David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1992] HCA 48
Citation 2

…Dillon (1993) 111 ALR 289. [6] David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 66 ALJR 768 at 779. 23 The difficulty in assessing whether there was a contract for an “entire and indivisible” promise in this instance is that there is little evidence discrete to the purpose of the advertisement in que…
Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon [1993] HCATrans 100
Citation 3

…t in fact received. [5] Principles confirmed and explained in Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 111 ALR 289. [6] David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 66 ALJR 768 at 779. 23 The difficulty in assessing whether there was a contract for an “entire and indivisible” promise in this instance is…

AI Chat coming soon