Vincent Kevin Lowe v Racing Australia Ltd
Case
•
[2017] ATMO 20
•1 March 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Vincent Kevin Lowe v Racing Australia Ltd [2017] ATMO 20
[2017] ATMO 20
1 March 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This decision concerns an opposition filed by Vincent Kevin Lowe (the Opponent) against a trade mark application by Racing Australia Ltd (the Applicant). The dispute arose from the Applicant's trade mark application no. 1666433, which the Opponent sought to prevent from being registered. The matter was heard by Jock McDonagh, acting as a delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks.
The legal issues before the delegate were whether the grounds of opposition raised by the Opponent under sections 60 and 62A of the relevant Act had been established. The onus of proof rested on the Opponent, and the standard of proof required was the ordinary civil standard based on the balance of probabilities. The relevant date for determining the rights of the parties was the filing date of the application, 24 December 2014.
The delegate found that the Opponent had failed to establish the ground of opposition under section 62A. Consequently, the Opponent had not established any of the grounds of opposition. The delegate ordered that the trade mark application could proceed to registration, subject to a one-month waiting period from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. The Applicant, as the successful party, was awarded costs against the Opponent.
The legal issues before the delegate were whether the grounds of opposition raised by the Opponent under sections 60 and 62A of the relevant Act had been established. The onus of proof rested on the Opponent, and the standard of proof required was the ordinary civil standard based on the balance of probabilities. The relevant date for determining the rights of the parties was the filing date of the application, 24 December 2014.
The delegate found that the Opponent had failed to establish the ground of opposition under section 62A. Consequently, the Opponent had not established any of the grounds of opposition. The delegate ordered that the trade mark application could proceed to registration, subject to a one-month waiting period from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. The Applicant, as the successful party, was awarded costs against the Opponent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Standing
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
[1999] FCA 1020