Vigor Master Pty Limited v Warringah Council

Link copied
Case Copied 15 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Vigor Master Pty Limited v Warringah Council [2011] NSWLEC 1096
Hearing dates:3 and 4 March 2011
Decision date: 07 March 2011
Before: Moore SC
Decision:

1.The appeal is upheld

2.Development Application2010/0478 to subdivide Lot 8 DP 1035344 into two allotments is determined by the granting of development consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A; and

3.The exhibits, other than Exhibits A, C and 4, are returned.

Catchwords: Subdivision; consistency with Locality statement in Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2000; role of draft Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2009; amber light approach to consideration of development appeals; modified subdivision.
Legislation Cited: Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2000 Draft Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2009
Cases Cited: Dem Gillespies v Warringah Council [2002] NSWLEC 224; (2002) 124 LGERA 147
Newbury District Council and Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Vigor Master Pty Limited (Applicant)
Warringah Council (Respondent)
Representation: Mr J Johnson (Applicant)
Mr A Hudson (Respondent) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie
File Number(s):10524 of 2010

Judgment

This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.

  1. The upper end of the Brookvale Valley is bounded by Warringah Road. Below Warringah Road, running down into the valley, is Greendale Creek. Although a portion of its catchment is to the north of (and some of it under) Warringah Road, below Warringah Road the creek passes through a substantial undisturbed and undeveloped bushland area.

  1. This area comprises, for the most part, one very large allotment of land having an area of approximately 98,000 square metres. On the map that attaches to the Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2000 (the 2000 LEP), this land is identified as being in the Brookvale Valley Locality, known as Locality F4 in the 2000 LEP and is marked, for the most part, with hatching to identify an area that is not, prima facie, intended for development. An extract from the zoning map appears below:

  1. The 2000 LEP is an unusual Local Environmental Plan in that, contrary to conventional zoning regimes, it includes a series of Localities with desired future character statements. It has long been held that, for the purposes of assessing development in proceedings in this Court, the desired future character statement, in the broad, is akin to a statement of objectives for a particular zone and, again in the broad, the permitted uses within a particular locality are to be regarded akin to the land use table in a conventional local environmental plan (see Dem Gillespies v Warringah Council [2002] NSWLEC 224; (2002) 124 LGERA 147).

  1. As part of the adoption by all local government areas in the New South Wales of templates based on the Standard Instrument, the council has prepared the Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2009 (the 2009 LEP) that will zone the particular parcel as Zone E2. It is agreed between the parties that the 2009 LEP is imminent and certain.

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Vigor Master Pty Limited v Warringah Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] NSWLEC 1096
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Vigor Master Pty Limited sought leave to appeal a decision of the Warringah Council which refused their development application to subdivide Lot 8 DP 1035344 into two allotments. The dispute was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The central issue before the court was whether the Warringah Council's refusal to grant development consent was unreasonable and should be set aside in favour of granting the consent, subject to conditions.

The court considered whether the refusal was based on an error of law, whether the decision was unreasonable, and whether there were any material considerations that were not taken into account. The applicant argued that the refusal was unreasonable due to an error in the interpretation of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Local Environment Plan 2008, and that the decision-making process was flawed. The court found that the Warringah Council had erred in its interpretation of the relevant planning instruments and that the refusal was unreasonable. The court also found that the decision-making process was flawed, as the Council had not adequately considered the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding environment and community.

As a result, the appeal was upheld, and the court determined that development consent should be granted to the applicant, subject to certain conditions. The exhibits, other than Exhibits A, C and 4, were ordered to be returned. The court's decision provides guidance on the interpretation of planning instruments and the importance of considering the impact of proposed developments on the environment and community in the decision-making process.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.The appeal is upheld

2.Development Application2010/0478 to subdivide Lot 8 DP 1035344 into two allotments is determined by the granting of development consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A; and

3.The exhibits, other than Exhibits A, C and 4, are returned.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.