WEQ v Medical Board of Australia
[2021] VSCA 343
Citation 1
…[7][2021] VSCA 343 (‘ WEQ ’).…
Stanley Rural Community Inc v Stanley Pastoral Pty Ltd(ACN 163 142 363)
[2018] VSCA 104
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…d v Tulip Investments Pty Ltd (2013) 46 VR 709; Armstrong v Boulton (1990) VR 215, 223; Stanley Rural Community Inc v Stanley Pastoral Pty Ltd No 2 [2018] VSCA 104, [18].…
David Nolan v Executive Director, Land Management Policy,Department of Environment and Primary Industries
[2015] VSCA 301
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…stralia Ltd v Jaques (2014) 44 VR 780, 804 [81], Nolan v Executive Director, Land Management Policy, Department of Environment and Primary Industries [2015] VSCA 301, [48], [55].…
JGM Nominees Pty Ltd v Tulip Investments Pty Ltd
[2013] VSCA 125
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…ouncil (1998) 193 CLR 72, 97–8 [69] (McHugh J was in dissent, but not on this point of principle); JGM Nominees Pty Ltd v Tulip Investments Pty Ltd (2013) 46 VR 709; Armstrong v Boulton (1990) VR 215, 223; Stanley Rural Community Inc v Stanley Pastoral Pty Ltd No 2 [2018] VSCA 104, [18].…
Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice
[2010] HCA 24
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…stablished, the Tribunal will have to address the form of any proceeding suppression order. [11] Osland v Secretary, Department of Justice (No 2) (2010) 241 CLR 320, 332 [19].…
NBIF v Minister for Immigration
[2006] FMCA 182
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…n opportunity to do so. QDP shall be granted an indemnity certificate under s 4 of the Appeals Costs Act 1998 . [12] Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72, 97–8 [69] (McHugh J was in dissent, but not on this point of principle); JGM Nominees Pty Ltd v Tulip Investments Pty Ltd (2013) 46 VR 709; Armstron…
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11
Citation 7
(Para 1)
…s to costs, it will be afforded an opportunity to do so. QDP shall be granted an indemnity certificate under s 4 of the Appeals Costs Act 1998 . [12] Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72, 97–8 [69] (McHugh J was in dissent, but not on this point of principle); JGM Nominees Pty Ltd v Tulip Investments Pty Ltd (2013) 46 VR 70…
Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 34
Citation 8
…e on 12 December 2019 (Panel decision). The standard of proof which applies to a proceeding of this kind is as discussed in Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34 — that is, findings of fact must be proved to the reasonable satisfaction of the Tribunal having regard to the seriousness of the allegation(s), the in…
Jaques v AIG Australia Ltd
[2014] VSC 269
Citation 9
(Para 1)
…be permitted to contend that the Tribunal did not have power under ss 80 and 132(e) of the VCAT Act to make a proceeding suppression order.[9] [9]Cf AIG Australia Ltd v Jaques (2014) 44 VR 780, 804 [81], Nolan v Executive Director, Land Management Policy, Department of Environment and Primary Industries [2015] VSCA 301, [48], [55]…