| [2015] FWCA 6912 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association
(AG2015/5508)
QUEEN ELIZABETH CENTRE HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012-2016
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 7 OCTOBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Queen Elizabeth Centre Health Professionals Enterprise Agreement 2012 - 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Queen Elizabeth Centre Health Professionals Enterprise Agreement 2012 - 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Health Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 14 October 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE416061 PR572679>
- AGLC
- Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association [2015] FWCA 6912
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6912
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was genuinely an enterprise agreement, whether it was in the best interests of the employees, and whether it complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act. The association argued that the agreement was genuinely an enterprise agreement as it was entered into in good faith and covered a range of employment-related matters. The association also argued that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided better conditions and protections than the existing award. Finally, the association argued that the agreement complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act, including the requirement to give employees the opportunity to vote on the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was genuinely an enterprise agreement and that it was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission noted that the agreement provided improved pay rates and access to training and development opportunities, which were in line with industry standards. The Commission also found that the agreement complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act, including the requirement to give employees the opportunity to vote on the agreement. As a result, the Commission approved the agreement.
The Commission's decision was based on a careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented by the association and the employees. The Commission found that the agreement provided better conditions and protections for the employees than the existing award and that it was in their best interests. The Commission also found that the agreement complied with the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The Commission's decision was therefore in line with the principles of fairness and equity that underpin the Australian industrial relations system.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.