[2013] FWCA 9210 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association
(AG2013/11453)
MACEDON RANGES HEALTH (HEALTH AND ALLIED SERVICES, MANAGERS AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 21 NOVEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Macedon Ranges Health (Health and Allied Services, Managers and Administrative Officers) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Macedon Ranges Health (Health and Allied Services, Managers and Administrative Officers) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 28 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2015.
[4] The Health Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE405510 PR544889>
- AGLC
- Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association [2013] FWCA 9210
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9210
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the Commission was required to decide related to whether the agreement was "better off overall" for the employees covered by the agreement and whether it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission considered whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees, whether it provided for a reasonable balance between the interests of the employees and the employer, and whether it complied with the "no disadvantage" test.
The Commission found that the agreement was better off overall for the employees and that it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees, that it provided for a reasonable balance between the interests of the employees and the employer, and that it did not result in any employee being worse off overall. The Commission also found that the agreement complied with the "no disadvantage" test, as it did not result in any employee being disadvantaged compared to their previous terms and conditions of employment.
The Commission approved the agreement, and the Macedon Ranges Health (Health and Allied Services, Managers and Administrative Officers) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 was registered with the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.