[2013] FWCA 9617 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association
(AG2013/11623)
VICTORIAN PUBLIC HEALTH SECTOR (AMA VICTORIA) - DOCTORS IN TRAINING (SINGLE INTEREST EMPLOYERS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 10 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Victorian Public Health Sector (AMA Victoria) - Doctors in Training (Single Interest Employers) Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Victorian Public Health Sector (AMA Victoria) - Doctors in Training (Single Interest Employers) Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 17 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 March 2017.
The Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE405754 PR545436>
- AGLC
- Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association [2013] FWCA 9617
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9617
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the enterprise agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the agreement’s coverage, the negotiation process, and the terms and conditions it provided for. The Commission had to determine if the agreement was made in good faith and if it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees covered by it.
The Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement did not comply with certain provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission held that the agreement was not made in good faith because the employers had not made a genuine effort to negotiate with the Australian Medical Association (Victorian Branch) and had instead negotiated directly with a subgroup of doctors in training. Furthermore, the Commission found that some of the terms and conditions in the agreement were not fair and reasonable. The Commission did not grant approval of the enterprise agreement.
No orders were made as the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.