Victims of Crime Assistance Amendment Rules 2021 (Vic)
Victims of Crime Assistance Amendment Rules 2021
S.R. No. 9/2021
TABLE OF PROVISIONS
Rule Page
1Object
2Authorising provisions
3Commencement
4Principal Rules
5Amendment of object
6Definition
7New Rule 8A inserted
8New Rule 9A inserted
9Application may be lodged by fax or email
10When application made
11New Order 3A inserted
12New Form 3 inserted
═════════════
Endnotes
STATUTORY RULES 2021
S.R. No. 9/2021
Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1996
Victims of Crime Assistance Amendment Rules 2021
The Chief Magistrate together with 2 Deputy Chief Magistrates jointly make the following Rules:
1Object
The object of these Rules is to amend the Victims of Crime Assistance Rules 2020 as a consequence of amendments made to the Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1996 by the Justice Legislation Amendment (Supporting Victims and Other Matters) Act 2020.
2Authorising provisions
These Rules are made under section 57 of the Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1996 and all other enabling powers.
3Commencement
These Rules come into operation on 22 February 2021.
4Principal Rules
In these Rules, the Victims of Crime Assistance Rules 2020[1] are called the Principal Rules.
5Amendment of object
In Rule 1(b) of the Principal Rules, after "judicial registrars" (where twice occurring) insert "and Tribunal officers".
6Definition
Insert the following definition in Rule 5 of the Principal Rules—
"application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer means an application under section 59A of the Act;".
7New Rule 8A inserted
After Rule 8 of the Principal Rules insert—
"8A Application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer—Form 3
(1)An application under section 59A of the Act for review of a final decision of the Tribunal made by a Tribunal officer must be in Form 3.
(2)An application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer must be accompanied by an affidavit that sets out the reasons for the application.
(3)The application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer and the accompanying affidavit must be lodged within 14 days after the day on which the final decision of the Tribunal officer was made.
(4)The Tribunal may extend time for lodging under paragraph (3) before or after the time expires, whether or not an application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer is made before that time expires.".
8New Rule 9A inserted
After Rule 9 of the Principal Rules insert—
"9A Lodgement of application for review of decision of a Tribunal officer
(1)An application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer must be lodged with or posted to a registrar of the Tribunal at the venue of the Tribunal where the decision of the Tribunal officer was made.
(2)Despite paragraph (1), a registrar of the Tribunal may accept an application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer that is lodged with or posted to a registrar of the Tribunal at a venue of the Tribunal other than the venue referred to in that paragraph.".
9Application may be lodged by fax or email
(1)In the heading to Rule 10 of the Principal Rules, for "or email" substitute ", email or other electronic communication".
(2)In Rule 10 of the Principal Rules, for "or email" substitute ", email or other electronic communication".
10When application made
In Rule 11(1) of the Principal Rules, after "9" insert ", 9A".
11New Order 3A inserted
After Order 3 of the Principal Rules insert—
"Order 3A—Tribunal officers
14APowers of Tribunal officer
A Tribunal officer—
(a)may exercise any power delegated to that Tribunal officer by instrument under section 24(4) of the Act; and
(b)has all the powers of the Tribunal necessary to exercise those delegated powers.
14BReview of a decision of a Tribunal officer by Tribunal
(1)An application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer must be determined by the Tribunal after consideration of the application and the accompanying affidavit.
(2)The Tribunal, after examining the application and accompanying affidavit may—
(a)determine the review on the papers; or
(b)set a date, time and place for hearing the review.
(3)In determining the review, the Tribunal may—
(a)affirm the final decision; or
(b)set aside the final decision and make another final decision in substitution for it.
14CStay
Unless the Tribunal otherwise orders, the lodging of an application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer does not operate as a stay of any final decision made by a Tribunal officer as delegate of the Tribunal.".
12New Form 3 inserted
After Form 2 of the Principal Rules insert—
"Form 3—Application for review of a decision of a Tribunal officer
Rule 8A
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION OF A TRIBUNAL OFFICER
(Victims of Crime Assistance Rules 2020)
Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal
| DETAILS OF PERSON SEEKING REVIEW Surname: Given names: Address: Postcode: Telephone: (H) (W) (M) |
| DECISION TO BE REVIEWED I apply to the Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal under section 59A of the Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1996 to have the following decision made by a Tribunal officer reviewed: Date of decision: Tribunal venue where decision made: Tribunal reference No.: NOTE: An applicant must file an affidavit with their application setting out the reasons for seeking a review of a final decision of a Tribunal officer. |
| MATERIAL IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW APPLICATION Do you wish to file any additional material in support of your review application? o Yes If yes, please file all additional supporting material with the Tribunal within 28 days from the date of this application. |
DETERMINATION OF YOUR REVIEW APPLICATION Would you prefer to: o Attend a hearing at the Tribunal? OR Do you request that: o Proceedings be conducted in a closed Court? Do you require an interpreter? Yes o No o If yes, specify a language. |
| SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Signature: Date: [signed by the person making the application NOTE: An application for review under section 59A of the Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1996 is treated as a hearing de novo of the original application for assistance. Upon review, the Tribunal may either refuse the application for review or make its own decision in substitution for the original order. |
".
Dated: 17 February 2021
LISA HANNAN,
Chief MagistrateFELICITY BROUGHTON,
Deputy Chief MagistrateSUSAN WAKELING,
Deputy Chief Magistrate
═════════════
Endnotes
[1] Rule 4: S.R. No. 88/2020.
0
0
0