Legal Research
Cases
Verdon & Verdon

Verdon & Verdon

Case [2020] FamCA 824 30 September 2020

Type to search within this case.

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VERDON & VERDON

[2020] FamCA 824

FAMILY LAW – EXPERT EVIDENCE – husband’s application to rely on an adversarial witness – application granted.

FAMILY LAW – PART PROPERTY – several prior orders already made – wife seeking $500,000 – husband agreeing to pay $348,288.63 – just and equitable to make order for $500,000 so as to enable wife to pay all legal costs previously incurred and a further sum.

FAMILY LAW – LITIGATION FUNDING – wife seeking a further amount on top of $500,000 – husband proposing a dollar-for-dollar order – review of authorities – held, litigation funding’s purpose is for meeting costs actually incurred and not for costs yet to be incurred – review of authorities – dollar-for-dollar order doubted – application for litigation funding order refused.

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 135
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 74, 79, 80, 114, 117
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) rr 1.12, 15.42, 15.49(2), 15.51, 15.52
Statute of Gloucester 1278, 6 Edw 1

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Verdon & Verdon

Details

AGLC: Verdon & Verdon [2020] FamCA 824
Case: [2020] FamCA 824
Decision Date: 30 September 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Verdon & Verdon*, heard by Wilson J, the dispute concerned the division of property and related litigation funding in a family law matter. The wife sought an order for $500,000, while the husband had agreed to pay $348,288.63. The wife also sought an additional sum for litigation funding.

The court was required to determine whether it was just and equitable to order the husband to pay $500,000 to the wife, and whether a further order for litigation funding should be made. The court also considered an application by the husband to rely on adversarial witness evidence.

Wilson J found that it was just and equitable to make an order for $500,000, which would enable the wife to cover her legal costs already incurred and a further sum. Regarding the application for litigation funding, the court reviewed relevant authorities and held that the purpose of such funding is to meet costs actually incurred, not those yet to be incurred. Consequently, the court doubted the appropriateness of a dollar-for-dollar order for future costs and refused the wife's application for further litigation funding. The husband's application to rely on adversarial witness evidence was granted. The parties were directed to bring in an agreed minute giving effect to these reasons by 4pm on 7 October 2020.

Orders

Orders of the court

On or before 4pm on 7 October 2020 the parties are to bring in an agreed minute that gives effect to these reasons.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Verdon & Verdon [2020] FamCA 824

Most Recent Citation

Kramer & Kramer [2023] FedCFamC2F 221

Cases Citing This Decision

Kramer & Kramer [2023] FedCFamC2F 221
Citation 1 (Para 6)

…ews held by the Court in the decisions of Selena & Montez and Ors ,[22] Atkins & Hunt ,[23] Quayle v Perceval,[24] and Salvage & Fosse .[25] [21] [2020] FamCA 824. [22] [2017] FamCA 583. [23] [2018] FamCA 14. [24] [2018] FamCA 664. [25] Verdon & Verdon [2020] FamCA 824, [99].…
Moretto & Cosola [2022] FedCFamC1F 433
Citation 2

…Salmon and Ors & Salmon [2020] FamCAFC 134 Tsoutsouvas & Tsoutsouvas and Ors [2012] FamCA 521 Verdon & Verdon (2020) 62 Fam LR 573; [2020] FamCA 824 Ingleby, Richard and Anne-Marie Rice , “Professional Insights: When can a party to contested proceedings have leave to adduce evidence from an adversarial expert when…
Artinos & Artinos [2022] FedCFamC1F 221
Citation 3 (Para 12)

…Similarly, in Verdon v Verdon [2020] FamCA 824 at [113], the Honourable Justice Wilson said that he entertained “ very real doubt that this court is empowered by s 117(2) of the Family Law Act to make an interlocutory costs order in the nature of a litigation funding order in respect of future costs ”.…
CAO & TRONG [2021] FamCA 316
Citation 4 (Para 8)

…he learning on the point in Verdon & Verdon .[1] It was prudent that the wife cast this case as an interim property application and not otherwise. [1][2020] FamCA 824.…
Verdon and Verdon (No 2) [2021] FamCA 258
Citation 5 (Para 2)

…been the subject of my consideration in the earlier reasons reported as Verdon & Verdon .[1] No useful purpose is served in reciting them again. [1] [2020] FamCA 824.…
Sigley and De Santis & Ors (No 3) [2020] FamCA 883
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…consequences and strict application of the requirements of Chapter 15 of the Family Law Rules . I say that for the following reasons – [3] [2020] FamCA 824. a)since at least 2 March 2016 when Bennett J made orders concerning Mr C’s evidence, all parties have been aware of the role of Mr C in this litigation; b)on…

See all citing cases →

Cases Cited

Salvage & Fosse [2020] FamCAFC 144
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…submissions. [30] See paragraph 3 of those submissions. [31] (1996) 20 Fam LR 766. [32] [2007] FamCA 418. [33] (2009) 42 Fam LR 203. [34] [2020] FamCAFC 144. [35] [2006] NSWSC 578. [36] [2017] FamCA 583.…
Guild & Stasiuk [2020] FamCA 348
Citation 2

…zgerald v Fish (2005) 33 Fam LR 123 G & T (2003) 32 Fam LR 101 Gabel & Yardley (2008) 40 Fam LR 66 Gronow v Gronow (1979) 144 CLR 513 Guild & Stasiuk [2020] FamCA 348 Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 I Limited & Chester and Ors (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 51 In the Marriage of Burridge (1980) 6 Fam LR 513 In the…
Cao & Trong (No 2) [2019] FamCA 941
Citation 3 (Para 11)

…In Cao & Trong (No 2)[23] I distilled the relevant principles mostly from Strahan . They were as follows – [23] [2019] FamCA 941. 34.In relation to interim property orders, certain guiding principles are applicable to the facts of this case. They include the following – a)the majority of the court in Strahan & Stra…
Strahan v Strahan [2019] HCASL 327
Citation 4

…bourne v Shelbourne (2019) 60 Fam LR 183 Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108 Stephens & Stephens and Anor (Enforcement) (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 172 Strahan v Strahan (Interim Property Orders) (2009) 42 Fam LR 203 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Tamaniego & Tamaniego (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 30 Tang & Fei (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 29 Taylor…
Quayle & Perceval [2018] FamCA 664
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…Quayle & Perceval[38] has held that s 117 is not a source of power in relation to anticipated future legal costs; [37] [2017] FamCA 583. [38] [2018] FamCA 664. g)the authority of In the Marriage of Zschokke[39] and Strahan v Strahan[40] make plain that s 117 confers the necessary power to make an order for litigati…
Judd & Treasure [2018] FamCA 50
Citation 6 (Para 7)

…dollar-for-dollar funding of the sort canvassed by Watts J in Atkins & Hunt[9] and by Hannam J in Judd & Treasure .[10] [9] [2018] FamCA 14. [10] [2018] FamCA 50.…
Atkins & Hunt And Ors [2018] FamCA 14
Citation 7 (Para 7)

…37) the better way is dollar-for-dollar funding of the sort canvassed by Watts J in Atkins & Hunt[9] and by Hannam J in Judd & Treasure .[10] [9] [2018] FamCA 14. [10] [2018] FamCA 50.…
Thorne v Kennedy [2017] HCA 49
Citation 8

…dowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Tamaniego & Tamaniego (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 30 Tang & Fei (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 29 Taylor v Taylor (1979) 143 CLR 1 Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 263 CLR 85 Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (2008) 233 CLR 259 Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon (2003) 77 ALJR 1598 Wilkie v B…
Selena & Montez and Ors [2017] FamCA 583
Citation 9 (Para 1)

…ssions. [31] (1996) 20 Fam LR 766. [32] [2007] FamCA 418. [33] (2009) 42 Fam LR 203. [34] [2020] FamCAFC 144. [35] [2006] NSWSC 578. [36] [2017] FamCA 583.…
Wilkie v Brown [2016] NSWCA 128
Citation 10 (Para 8)

…er by agreement or assessment; and d)by reason of the absence of certainty, the possibility of review is compromised. [94] [2018] FamCA 664. [95] [2016] NSWCA 128. [96] [2011] NSWCA 375.…
Klearchos & Klearchos & Ors [2015] FamCAFC 217
Citation 11 (Para 2)

…[82] f) Judd & Treasure ;[83] g) Quayle & Perceval ;[84] and h) Shelbourne v Shelbourne .[85] [78] (2003) 32 Fam LR 101. [79] [2011] FamCA 20. [80] [2015] FamCAFC 217. [81] [2017] FamCA 583. [82] [2018] FamCA 14. [83] [2018] FamCA 50. [84] [2018] FamCA 664. [85] (2019) 60 Fam LR 183.…
Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52
Citation 12

…ictoria Legal Aid (1998) 195 CLR 184 Salvage & Fosse [2020] FamCAFC 144 Selena & Montez [2017] FamCA 583 Shelbourne v Shelbourne (2019) 60 Fam LR 183 Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108 Stephens & Stephens and Anor (Enforcement) (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 172 Strahan v Strahan (Interim Property Orders) (2009) 42 Fam LR 203 Su…
Daniels and Findlay (No 4) [2012] FamCA 864
Citation 13 (Para 6)

…) 70 ALJR 541. [67] (1990) 65 ALJR 195. [68] (1950) 81 CLR 418. [69] (1979) 144 CLR 513. [70] (1985) 59 ALJR 481. [71] (1990) 169 CLR 245. [72] (1993) 46 FLR 225. [73] (1998) 195 CLR 184. [74] (2003) 77 ALJR 1598.…
Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375
Citation 14 (Para 8)

…ssment; and d)by reason of the absence of certainty, the possibility of review is compromised. [94] [2018] FamCA 664. [95] [2016] NSWCA 128. [96] [2011] NSWCA 375.…
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21
Citation 15

…) 179 CLR 403 Cao & Trong (No 2) [2019] FamCA 941 Casley & Casley (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 189 Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FLR 225 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 Esdale v Schenk (2012) 46 Fam LR 547 Fitzgerald v Fish (2005) 33 Fam LR 123 G & T (2003) 32 Fam LR 101 Gabel & Yardley (2008) 40 Fam LR 6…
I Limited & Chester and Ors (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 51
Citation 16 (Para 2)

…Enforcement) (Costs) ,[49] Tang & Fei (Costs) ,[50] Jamine & Jamine (Costs)[51] and Tamaniego & Tamaniego (Costs) .[52] [44] (1998) 195 CLR 184. [45] [2011] FamCAFC 51. [46] [2010] FamCAFC 190. [47] [2010] FamCAFC 189. [48] [2008] FamCAFC 158. [49] [2010] FamCAFC 172. [50] [2011] FamCAFC 29. [51] [2010] FamCAFC 191.…
Tian and Fong (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 29
Citation 17 (Para 2)

…(1998) 195 CLR 184. [45] [2011] FamCAFC 51. [46] [2010] FamCAFC 190. [47] [2010] FamCAFC 189. [48] [2008] FamCAFC 158. [49] [2010] FamCAFC 172. [50] [2011] FamCAFC 29. [51] [2010] FamCAFC 191. [52] [2011] FamCAFC 30.…
Tamaniego and Tamaniego (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 30
Citation 18 (Para 2)

…[2010] FamCAFC 190. [47] [2010] FamCAFC 189. [48] [2008] FamCAFC 158. [49] [2010] FamCAFC 172. [50] [2011] FamCAFC 29. [51] [2010] FamCAFC 191. [52] [2011] FamCAFC 30.…
Iphostrou & Iphostrou and Ors [2011] FamCA 20
Citation 19 (Para 2)

…81] e) Atkins & Hunt ;[82] f) Judd & Treasure ;[83] g) Quayle & Perceval ;[84] and h) Shelbourne v Shelbourne .[85] [78] (2003) 32 Fam LR 101. [79] [2011] FamCA 20. [80] [2015] FamCAFC 217. [81] [2017] FamCA 583. [82] [2018] FamCA 14. [83] [2018] FamCA 50. [84] [2018] FamCA 664. [85] (2019) 60 Fam LR 183.…
Paul and Kylie (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 190
Citation 20 (Para 2)

…9] Tang & Fei (Costs) ,[50] Jamine & Jamine (Costs)[51] and Tamaniego & Tamaniego (Costs) .[52] [44] (1998) 195 CLR 184. [45] [2011] FamCAFC 51. [46] [2010] FamCAFC 190. [47] [2010] FamCAFC 189. [48] [2008] FamCAFC 158. [49] [2010] FamCAFC 172. [50] [2011] FamCAFC 29. [51] [2010] FamCAFC 191. [52] [2011] FamCAFC 30.…
Casley & Casley (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 189
Citation 21 (Para 2)

…0] Jamine & Jamine (Costs)[51] and Tamaniego & Tamaniego (Costs) .[52] [44] (1998) 195 CLR 184. [45] [2011] FamCAFC 51. [46] [2010] FamCAFC 190. [47] [2010] FamCAFC 189. [48] [2008] FamCAFC 158. [49] [2010] FamCAFC 172. [50] [2011] FamCAFC 29. [51] [2010] FamCAFC 191. [52] [2011] FamCAFC 30.…
Jamine and Jamine (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 191
Citation 22 (Para 2)

…] [2011] FamCAFC 51. [46] [2010] FamCAFC 190. [47] [2010] FamCAFC 189. [48] [2008] FamCAFC 158. [49] [2010] FamCAFC 172. [50] [2011] FamCAFC 29. [51] [2010] FamCAFC 191. [52] [2011] FamCAFC 30.…
Stephens v Stephens [2010] FamCAFC 172
Citation 23 (Para 2)

…aniego (Costs) .[52] [44] (1998) 195 CLR 184. [45] [2011] FamCAFC 51. [46] [2010] FamCAFC 190. [47] [2010] FamCAFC 189. [48] [2008] FamCAFC 158. [49] [2010] FamCAFC 172. [50] [2011] FamCAFC 29. [51] [2010] FamCAFC 191. [52] [2011] FamCAFC 30.…
Oscar & Traynor [2008] FamCAFC 158
Citation 24 (Para 2)

…)[51] and Tamaniego & Tamaniego (Costs) .[52] [44] (1998) 195 CLR 184. [45] [2011] FamCAFC 51. [46] [2010] FamCAFC 190. [47] [2010] FamCAFC 189. [48] [2008] FamCAFC 158. [49] [2010] FamCAFC 172. [50] [2011] FamCAFC 29. [51] [2010] FamCAFC 191. [52] [2011] FamCAFC 30.…
Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [2008] HCA 5
Citation 25

…aniego & Tamaniego (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 30 Tang & Fei (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 29 Taylor v Taylor (1979) 143 CLR 1 Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 263 CLR 85 Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (2008) 233 CLR 259 Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon (2003) 77 ALJR 1598 Wilkie v Brown [2016] NSWCA 128…
Bing & Bing [2007] FamCA 418
Citation 26 (Para 1)

…ds in paragraph 2 of the wife’s 24 September 2020 submissions. [30] See paragraph 3 of those submissions. [31] (1996) 20 Fam LR 766. [32] [2007] FamCA 418. [33] (2009) 42 Fam LR 203. [34] [2020] FamCAFC 144. [35] [2006] NSWSC 578. [36] [2017] FamCA 583.…
Paris King Investments Pty Ltd v Rayhill [2006] NSWSC 578
Citation 27 (Para 1)

…agraph 3 of those submissions. [31] (1996) 20 Fam LR 766. [32] [2007] FamCA 418. [33] (2009) 42 Fam LR 203. [34] [2020] FamCAFC 144. [35] [2006] NSWSC 578. [36] [2017] FamCA 583.…
McNamara v Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal [2005] HCA 55
Citation 28

…l, Department of Transport (2001) 205 CLR 603 McLean v McLean (unreported) 30 January 2003 McNamara (McGrath) v Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (2005) 221 CLR 646 Metwally v University of Wollongong (1985) 59 ALJR 481 Mullane v Mullane (1983) 158 CLR 436 New Zealand Flax Investments Ltd v Federal Commissioner o…
Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon [2003] HCA 48
Citation 29

…aylor v Taylor (1979) 143 CLR 1 Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 263 CLR 85 Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (2008) 233 CLR 259 Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon (2003) 77 ALJR 1598 Wilkie v Brown [2016] NSWCA 128…
Marshall v Director General, Department of Transport [2001] HCA 37
Citation 30

…Commonwealth (No 2) (1996) 70 ALJR 541 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Marshall v Director-General, Department of Transport (2001) 205 CLR 603 McLean v McLean (unreported) 30 January 2003 McNamara (McGrath) v Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (2005) 221 CLR 646 Metwally v University of W…
Re JJT; Ex Parte Victoria Legal Aid [1998] HCA 44
Citation 31 (Para 2)

…ens & Stephens and Anor (Enforcement) (Costs) ,[49] Tang & Fei (Costs) ,[50] Jamine & Jamine (Costs)[51] and Tamaniego & Tamaniego (Costs) .[52] [44] (1998) 195 CLR 184. [45] [2011] FamCAFC 51. [46] [2010] FamCAFC 190. [47] [2010] FamCAFC 189. [48] [2008] FamCAFC 158. [49] [2010] FamCAFC 172. [50] [2011] FamCAFC 29.…
Cachia v Hanes [1994] HCA 14
Citation 32

…Atkins & Hunt [2018] FamCA 14 Bing & Bing [2007] FamCA 418 Breen v Breen (1990) 65 ALJR 195 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 Cao & Trong (No 2) [2019] FamCA 941 Casley & Casley (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 189 Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FLR 225 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 Esdale v Schen…
Nguyen v Nguyen [1990] HCA 9
Citation 33

…longong (1985) 59 ALJR 481 Mullane v Mullane (1983) 158 CLR 436 New Zealand Flax Investments Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1938) 61 CLR 179 Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 Ogden Industries Pty Ltd v Lucas [1970] AC 113 Oscar & Traynor [2008] FamCAFC 158 Paris King Investments Pty Ltd v Rayhill [2006] NSWSC 5…
Metwally v University of Wollongong [1985] HCA 28
Citation 34

…ansport (2001) 205 CLR 603 McLean v McLean (unreported) 30 January 2003 McNamara (McGrath) v Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (2005) 221 CLR 646 Metwally v University of Wollongong (1985) 59 ALJR 481 Mullane v Mullane (1983) 158 CLR 436 New Zealand Flax Investments Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1938) 61 CLR 179 Nguyen v Nguye…
Mullane v Mullane [1983] HCA 4
Citation 35

…30 January 2003 McNamara (McGrath) v Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (2005) 221 CLR 646 Metwally v University of Wollongong (1985) 59 ALJR 481 Mullane v Mullane (1983) 158 CLR 436 New Zealand Flax Investments Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1938) 61 CLR 179 Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 Ogden Industries…
Penfold v Penfold [1980] HCA 4
Citation 36

…as [1970] AC 113 Oscar & Traynor [2008] FamCAFC 158 Paris King Investments Pty Ltd v Rayhill [2006] NSWSC 578 Paul & Kylie (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 190 Penfold v Penfold (1980) 144 CLR 311 Quayle & Perceval [2018] FamCA 664 Re JJT; Ex parte Victoria Legal Aid (1998) 195 CLR 184 Salvage & Fosse [2020] FamCAFC 144 Selena & Mon…
Gronow v Gronow [1979] HCA 63
Citation 37

…43 CLR 588 Esdale v Schenk (2012) 46 Fam LR 547 Fitzgerald v Fish (2005) 33 Fam LR 123 G & T (2003) 32 Fam LR 101 Gabel & Yardley (2008) 40 Fam LR 66 Gronow v Gronow (1979) 144 CLR 513 Guild & Stasiuk [2020] FamCA 348 Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 I Limited & Chester and Ors (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 51 In the Ma…
Taylor v Taylor [1979] HCA 38
Citation 38 (Para 1)

…e, endorsed by the High Court in the case of Taylor v Taylor (1979) 5 Fam LR 289 that an order under s 79 is a once and for all proposition. [14] (1979) 143 CLR 1. [15] (1989) 13 Fam LR 158.…
Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd [1950] HCA 35
Citation 39

…2) 247 CLR 108 Stephens & Stephens and Anor (Enforcement) (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 172 Strahan v Strahan (Interim Property Orders) (2009) 42 Fam LR 203 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Tamaniego & Tamaniego (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 30 Tang & Fei (Costs) [2011] FamCAFC 29 Taylor v Taylor (1979) 143 CLR 1 Thorne v Kennedy (20…
New Zealand Flax Investments Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1938] HCA 60
Citation 40

…University of Wollongong (1985) 59 ALJR 481 Mullane v Mullane (1983) 158 CLR 436 New Zealand Flax Investments Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1938) 61 CLR 179 Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 Ogden Industries Pty Ltd v Lucas [1970] AC 113 Oscar & Traynor [2008] FamCAFC 158 Paris King Investments Pty Ltd v…
Lindon v Commonwealth (No 2) [1996] HCA 14
Citation 41

…Atkins & Hunt [2018] FamCA 14 Bing & Bing [2007] FamCA 418 Breen v Breen (1990) 65 ALJR 195 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 Cao & Trong (No 2) [2019] FamCA 941 Casley & Casley (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 189 Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FLR 225 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 C…
[1970] AC 113 [1970] AC 113
Citation 42

…Zealand Flax Investments Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1938) 61 CLR 179 Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 Ogden Industries Pty Ltd v Lucas [1970] AC 113 Oscar & Traynor [2008] FamCAFC 158 Paris King Investments Pty Ltd v Rayhill [2006] NSWSC 578 Paul & Kylie (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 190 Penfold v Penfol…
Pty Ltd v Sprowles 636 F Supp 1419
Citation 43

…mCAFC 191 Judd & Treasure [2018] FamCA 50 Klearchos & Klearchos [2015] FamCAFC 217 Lindon v Commonwealth (No 2) (1996) 70 ALJR 541 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Marshall v Director-General, Department of Transport (2001) 205 CLR 603 McLean v McLean (unreported) 30 January 2003 McNamara (McGrath)…
Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 255
Citation 44

…418 Breen v Breen (1990) 65 ALJR 195 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 Cao & Trong (No 2) [2019] FamCA 941 Casley & Casley (Costs) [2010] FamCAFC 189 Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FLR 225 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 Esdale v Schenk (2012) 46 Fam LR 547 Fitzgerald v Fish (2005) 33 Fam LR 123 G & T (2003) 32 F…

Legislation Cited

Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) 1.12, 15.42, 15.49(2), 15.51, 15.52, 6
7 mentions (from Para 2)
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) 114, 117, 74, 79, 80
6 mentions
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) 135
1 mention