Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ventureland Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 1504 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 22 July 2015 Date of orders: 27 November 2015 Decision date: 27 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ventureland Pty Limited (Applicant)
Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr A. Whealy solicitor (Applicant)
Mr A. Singh solicitor (Respondent)
Gadens (Applicant)
Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10478 of 2015 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Commissioner O’Neill
10478 of 2015 O'Neill (O) (72.5 KB, pdf)
10478 of 2015 O'Neill (C) (459 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Ventureland Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 1504
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1504
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the council's refusal to approve the development was lawful. Ventureland contended that the council failed to provide adequate reasons for the refusal, did not consider all relevant matters, and acted outside its statutory powers. The council, on the other hand, argued that the refusal was based on valid considerations, including the impact on the local environment and heritage values.
The court found that the council's refusal was unlawful. It held that the council failed to provide adequate reasons for the refusal, did not consider all relevant matters, and acted outside its statutory powers. The court also found that the council did not properly consider the potential benefits of the development, such as increased employment opportunities and economic activity. The court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration.
The court ordered that the council reconsider the development application, taking into account all relevant matters, including the potential benefits of the development. The court also ordered that the council provide Ventureland with written reasons for its decision. The council was further ordered to pay Ventureland's costs of the proceeding.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.