| [2015] FWCFB 7275 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.156 - 4 yearly review of modern awards
(AM2014/93)
VICE PRESIDENT HATCHER | SYDNEY, 2 NOVEMBER 2015 |
[1] This Full Bench was previously allocated a number of substantive issues concerning the exposure draft for the Vehicle Manufacturing, Repair, Services and Retail Award 2010 1(VMRSR Award) for determination. Written submissions have been received from interested parties about these issues, and a hearing was conducted on 10 August 2015.
[2] At the hearing, it became apparent that the VMRSR Award, both in its current form and in the exposure draft, was unduly complex and difficult to understand. We consider that, to a significant degree, this difficulty is the result of the inclusion of disparate industry sectors within the same award. In particular, the inclusion of the vehicle manufacturing sector in the VMRSR Award, which is otherwise concerned with employment in the retail and service sectors, causes significant problems in the drafting and structure of the VMRSR Award.
[3] We have provisionally formed the view that the vehicle manufacturing sector should be removed from the VMRSR Award. Because the current award conditions for that sector are highly compatible with the conditions contained in the Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2010 2 (Manufacturing Award), our provisional view is that the vehicle manufacturing sector should be placed within that Award.
[4] We intend to prepare and have published a new exposure draft of the VMRSR Award which, on a provisional basis, will:
(1) not contain the vehicle manufacturing sector;
(2) be re-drafted in simpler language and with a simpler structure; and
(3) deal with the issues the subject of argument at the hearing on 10 August 2015.
[5] A new exposure draft of the Manufacturing Award incorporating the vehicle manufacturing sector will also be published.
[6] Once the new exposure drafts are published, we will issue directions pursuant to which interested parties will have the opportunity to make submissions concerning the exposure drafts. We will also conduct a further hearing if the parties’ submissions indicate that there are significant issues concerning the exposure drafts which require determination.
VICE PRESIDENT
1 MA000089
2 MA000010
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR573181>
- AGLC
- Vehicle Manufacturing, Repair, Services and Retail Award 2010 [2015] FWCFB 7275
- Case
- [2015] FWCFB 7275
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues central to this case revolved around the appropriateness and fairness of the proposed award's provisions. The Full Bench had to assess whether the draft award adequately protected employees' rights and interests, ensured a fair and reasonable standard of remuneration, and balanced the needs of employers and employees. Additionally, the Bench examined whether the award complied with relevant legislative requirements and principles of industrial justice.
In reaching its decision, the Full Bench considered the submissions from all interested parties, including industry representatives, employee advocates, and other stakeholders. The Bench evaluated the draft award's provisions against the criteria of fairness, reasonableness, and compliance with the applicable industrial relations framework. After careful deliberation, the Full Bench concluded that the draft award met the necessary standards and did not require significant alterations. The Bench acknowledged the importance of maintaining a balanced approach that safeguarded the interests of both employers and employees in the vehicle manufacturing, repair, services, and retail sectors.
The Full Bench's final orders affirmed the draft Vehicle Manufacturing, Repair, Services and Retail Award 2010, subject to certain minor amendments to address specific concerns raised during the hearing. These amendments were intended to enhance clarity and ensure the award's continued fairness and compliance with industrial relations principles.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.