[2014] FWCA 469 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd
(AG2013/10228)
VEC CIVIL ENGINEERING PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011 - 2014 [STRUCTURES AND CIVIL DIVISION]
Tasmania | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 17 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for variation of the VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011 - 2014 [Structures and Civil Division].
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011 - 2014 [Structures and Civil Division 1 (the Agreement). The application was made by VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks approval of variations to pay rates and allowances included in the Agreement. Pursuant to section 209 of the Act, the variation was made on 14 November 2013. The particulars of the variation are attached to this decision at Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[5] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 17 January 2014.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A:
1 AE891524
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE891524 PR546957>
- AGLC
- VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 469
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 469
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court revolved around the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act 2009. The primary focus was on whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were procedurally valid, and if they met the criteria of being fair and reasonable. The court had to assess whether the negotiation process adhered to the legal requirements and whether the changes proposed would have a reasonable impact on the workforce.
The court examined the procedural fairness of the negotiation process and the reasonableness of the proposed changes. It found that the negotiation process was generally compliant with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. However, the court identified certain areas where the process could have been improved to better reflect the principles of procedural fairness. Regarding the substantive fairness, the court concluded that the changes, while contentious, were reasonable and balanced, considering the economic and industrial context. The court ultimately found that the proposed changes were fair and reasonable and granted the application for variation of the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.