VEAF of 2002 & Ors v MIMIA & Anor

[2006] HCATrans 168

[2006] HCATrans 168

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Melbourne  No M117 of 2005

B e t w e e n -

VEAF OF 2002, VEAG OF 2002 AND VEAH OF 2003

Applicants

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CRENNAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON TUESDAY, 11 APRIL 2006, AT 1.51 PM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

__________________

HAYNE J:   The applicants are husband, wife and child. Each is a citizen of the Ukraine. They seek special leave to appeal against orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Sundberg J) exercising the appellate jurisdiction of that Court on appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court. The Federal Magistrates Court dismissed the applicants’ application for relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) directed to the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal affirming the decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse the applicants protection visas.

Because the applicants are unrepresented their application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of Sundberg J.

Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish that disposition.

AT 1.52 PM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED