[2019] FWCA 4572
The attached document wholly replaces the document previously issued with the code [2019] FWC 4561 on 1 July 2019 to correct document referencing. The new reference is [2019] FWCA 4572.
Margot Hagen
Relief Associate to Deputy President Hamilton
Dated: 1 July 2019
| [2019] FWCA 4572 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222 - Application for approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement
Vault Plumbing Pty Ltd
(AG2019/2081)
BURBANK PLUMBING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2010-2013
Plumbing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 1 JULY 2019 |
Application for termination of the Burbank Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2010-2013.
[1] On 18 June 2019, Vault Plumbing Pty Ltd (the Applicant) made an application pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Burbank Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2010-2013 (the Agreement).
[2] The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement and its nominal expiry date is 1 February 2013.
[3] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.
[4] Pursuant to s.222 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.223 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[5] The termination will operate from 1 July 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
<AE879261 PR709902>
- AGLC
- Vault Plumbing Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 4572
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 4572
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around whether the employer had satisfied the criteria for termination under section 239 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the employer had demonstrated a significant change in business circumstances that warranted the termination of the enterprise agreement. The employer argued that economic pressures, including reduced profitability and an inability to meet the financial obligations of the agreement, constituted a significant change in business circumstances. The union countered that the employer had not provided sufficient evidence to support these claims and that the agreement should remain in force.
The court examined the evidence presented by both parties and considered the employer's financial records, market conditions, and the overall impact on the business. It found that the employer had not sufficiently demonstrated a significant change in business circumstances that warranted the termination of the enterprise agreement. The court highlighted that the employer's financial difficulties were not solely due to external factors but also stemmed from internal management decisions. Consequently, the application for termination was dismissed. The Burbank Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2010-2013 remained in effect, binding both parties until its natural expiry or until further order of the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.