| [2023] FWCFB 46 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.160—Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty or correct error
Variation on the Commission’s own motion—method of adjusting wage-related allowances
(AM2023/3)
| JUSTICE HATCHER, PRESIDENT | SYDNEY, 10 MARCH 2023 |
Section 160 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – variation on Commission’s own motion to remove error or uncertainty – Australian Capital Territory Public Sector Enterprise Award 2016 – State reference public sector and enterprise awards – method of adjusting wage-related allowances – determinations issued.
This matter was commenced on the Commission’s own motion to deal with various issues identified in respect of the adjustment of wage-related allowances. On 13 February 2023, we issued a statement (February Statement) outlining each of the issues and expressing provisional views as to how to address them. The issues can be summarised as follows:
·an error arising as a result of there having been no adjustment to the overtime allowance at clause F.1.2 of the Australian Capital Territory Public Sector Enterprise Award 2016 (ACTPSE Award) since the award’s commencement on 6 June 2016;
·an error or uncertainty in respect of a number of wage-related allowances in certain modern enterprise and State reference public sector modern awards, inclusive of the overtime allowance in the ACTPSE Award, which are expressed only as dollar figures and not percentages of the standard rate; and
·an error or uncertainty in respect of the standard approach to describing the adjustment of wage-related allowances across modern awards more broadly as dollar amounts “based on a percentage of the standard rate” where they are better understood as the given percentage of the standard rate.
A schedule of draft determinations to give effect to our provisional views was published concurrently with the February Statement. Interested parties were invited to file submissions in response to the draft determinations by 4:00 pm (AEDT) on Tuesday, 28 February 2023.
We received one submission in response from the Association of Digital Service Providers Australia New Zealand (ADSPANZ). The ADSPANZ was broadly supportive of resolving the issue identified concerning the standard approach to describing the adjustment of wage-related allowances across certain modern awards but sought further clarification as to the rounding approach within the identified awards. The ADSPANZ submitted that including this clarification in the identified awards would ensure consistent rounding is applied, especially within payroll, rostering, time and attendance software.
We do not intend to deal with the submission from the ADSPANZ concerning rounding in this decision because it concerns a different subject matter. However, we will give consideration as to whether this issue should be the subject of a separate proceeding at some time in the future.
We confirm our provisional views at [11], [15] and [19] of the February Statement. We consider that the variations to the overtime allowance in the ACTPSE Award and in respect of a number of wage-related allowances in certain modern enterprise and State reference public sector modern awards are necessary to remove error and uncertainty. We also consider the variation to the standard approach to describing the adjustment of wage-related allowances across modern awards more broadly to be necessary to remove error and uncertainty.
Determinations varying 135 modern awards will be published with this decision. The operative date of the determinations will be 15 March 2023.
PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR751304>
- AGLC
- Variation on the Commission’s own motion—method of adjusting wage-related allowances [2023] FWCFB 46
- Case
- [2023] FWCFB 46
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the Commission had the authority to unilaterally vary the award to correct what it considered to be an error or uncertainty in the method of adjusting wage-related allowances. This required an examination of the scope and limits of the Commission's powers under section 160 of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether such a variation would be in the interests of justice and fairness, given the impact on the parties involved.
In addressing these issues, the Fair Work Commission found that it did have the requisite authority to vary the award on its own motion to correct errors or uncertainties. The court considered it appropriate to exercise this power to ensure that the award accurately reflected the legislative intent and provided clarity for future applications. The Commission determined that the proposed variation would indeed be in the interests of justice and fairness, as it would prevent potential misapplication of the wage-related allowances and ensure the award's provisions were correctly implemented.
Consequently, the Commission issued determinations to amend the Australian Capital Territory Public Sector Enterprise Award 2016, thereby correcting the identified error or uncertainty in the method of adjusting wage-related allowances. These determinations were made to enhance the clarity and accuracy of the award, ensuring it aligns with the legislative framework and serves the interests of all parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.