Variation on the Commission’s Own Motion – Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020 and Restaurant Industry Award 2020

Case [2022] FWC 1379


[2022] FWC 1379

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.160—Variation of modern award

Variation on the Commission’s Own Motion – Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020 and Restaurant Industry Award 2020

(AM2022/13)

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT

MELBOURNE, 1 JUNE 2022

Section 160 Fair Work Act 2009 – variation on the Commission’s own motion – changes to the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 – ambiguity or uncertainty – determinations issued.

  1. On 2 May 2022, I issued a Statement[1] (the May Statement) which outlined upcoming changes to the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (the Superannuation Act).

  1. The May Statement set out that:

·  On 22 February 2022, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Enhancing Superannuation Outcomes for Australians and Helping Australian Businesses Invest) Act 2022 (the Amending Act) received royal assent;

· The Amending Act removes the monthly minimum threshold for salary or wages to count towards the superannuation guarantee (repealing s27(2) of the Superannuation Act)[2];

·  The amendment applies in relation to a calendar month that is in a quarter beginning on or after 1 July 2022.[3]

  1. The Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020 (the Hospitality Award) and the Restaurant Industry Award 2020 (the Restaurant Award) both provide a lower threshold for salary or wages to be taken into account for the purposes of the superannuation guarantee than the $450 currently provided for in s27(2) of the Superannuation Act (which will shortly be repealed). These are the only two modern awards with such a provision.

  1. Section 160 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) allows the Commission to make a determination varying a modern award to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty or to correct an error.

  1. The May Statement set out my provisional view that clause 27.2(b) of the Hospitality Award and clause 22.2(b) of the Restaurant Award:

· from 1 July 2022, will create uncertainty as to when superannuation contributions are to be made, and that this constitutes an ‘uncertainty’ for the purposes of s.160 of the Act; and

·   should be deleted from the awards operative 1 July 2022 on the initiative of the Commission.

  1. Submissions opposing my provisional view were invited to be filed by 16 May 2022. No submissions were received.

  1. Pursuant to s.160 of the Act, I confirm my provisional view and the awards will be varied as set out in the May Statement.

  1. The determinations will be issued separately, with an operative date of 1 July 2022.

PRESIDENT


[1] [2022] FWC 992

[2] Schedule 1, item 1, Treasury Laws Amendment (Enhancing Superannuation Outcomes for Australians and Helping Australian Businesses Invest) Act 2022

[3] Schedule 1, item 2, Treasury Laws Amendment (Enhancing Superannuation Outcomes for Australians and Helping Australian Businesses Invest) Act 2022

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR742212>

Details
AGLC
Variation on the Commission’s Own Motion – Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020 and Restaurant Industry Award 2020 [2022] FWC 1379
Case
[2022] FWC 1379
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission was called upon to make a variation to two awards, the Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020 and the Restaurant Industry Award 2020, on its own motion. The changes were prompted by amendments to the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992, which required adjustments to be made to the relevant awards to ensure they remained compliant with the new legislation. The dispute arose from the need to clarify ambiguities and uncertainties in the existing awards that could potentially conflict with the updated superannuation laws.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the existing awards contained ambiguities or uncertainties that necessitated changes to align with the new superannuation laws. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine whether the current language in the awards was sufficiently clear and precise to avoid potential conflicts with the amended Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992. If ambiguities or uncertainties were found, the Commission would have to issue new determinations to rectify these issues.

In its reasoning, the Commission noted that certain provisions in the existing awards were indeed ambiguous and uncertain, leading to potential inconsistencies with the new superannuation laws. The Commission found that the language used in the awards did not clearly reflect the legislative changes, thereby creating a risk of non-compliance. Consequently, the Commission decided to vary the awards to ensure they were aligned with the updated requirements of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992. The new determinations were issued to eliminate the ambiguities and uncertainties, thereby maintaining compliance with the legislative framework.

The Commission issued new determinations to amend the Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020 and the Restaurant Industry Award 2020, ensuring they reflected the updated superannuation obligations. These changes were necessary to maintain consistency with the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 and to avoid any potential legal conflicts arising from ambiguities in the original awards. The determinations provided clear and precise language to ensure the awards were compliant with the new legislative requirements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.