VAO v MIMA
[2003] HCATrans 528
[2003] HCATrans 528
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Melbourne No M23 of 2002
B e t w e e n -
VAO
Applicant
and
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
Office of the Registry
Melbourne No M25 of 2002
B e t w e e n -
VAP
Applicant
and
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
Applications for special leave to appeal
GLEESON CJ
HAYNE J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT MELBOURNE ON FRIDAY, 12 DECEMBER 2003, AT 12.39 PM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
__________________
MR W.S. MOSLEY: If the Court pleases, I appear for the respondent. (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
GLEESON CJ: In both of these matters the applicants have indicated that they do not wish to adduce oral argument.
MR MOSLEY: Yes, your Honour, I appreciate that. We were not aware of that until yesterday.
GLEESON CJ: Thank you, Mr Mosley.
Having considered the written material before the Court in support of the application, we are of the view that there are insufficient prospects of success of an appeal to warrant a grant of special leave. In each case the application is refused with costs.
We are going to adjourn for a short time to reconstitute.
AT 12.40 PM THE MATTERS WERE CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
0
0
0