Van Der Zwaan v Van Der Zwaan & Anor

[2002] HCATrans 430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Perth  No P24 of 2001

B e t w e e n -

WILHELMUS VAN DER ZWAAN

Applicant

and

SOPIDA VAN DER ZWAAN

First Respondent

JOHN THOMAS SWANN

Second Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

GLEESON CJ
McHUGH J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT PERTH ON THURSDAY, 24 OCTOBER 2002, AT 12.22 PM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

GLEESON CJ:   In this matter there is a certificate from the Deputy Registrar saying that the applicant has informed her today that he does not intend to appear and present oral argument at the hearing of his application.  He proposes to rely on his written submissions and further written submissions which are attached to that certificate.

We have read the document entitled “Supplementary Oral Submissions of the Applicant”, together with the written submissions that he had made in the first place. 

This is an application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia.  We are of the view that there is insufficient reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Full Court of the Family Court to warrant the grant of special leave, and the application for special leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

We will adjourn to reconstitute.

AT 12.24 PM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED