FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| VAN DE BERG & VAN DE BERG | [2009] FamCAFC 112 |
| FAMILY LAW - APPEAL – CHILD SUPPORT – where the Magistrate ordered that Child Support Agency assessments against the father be departed from – where the father argued that there were errors in two dates and in a monetary amount in the Magistrate’s orders and sought the Full Court amend the orders to fix the errors – where leave to appeal required – leave to appeal granted – appeal allowed – orders amended by Full Court. FAMILY LAW - APPEAL – COSTS – costs certificates granted. |
| Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) |
| APPLICANT/APPELLANT: | Mr Van de Berg |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Van de Berg |
| FILE NUMBER: | PTW | 4816 | of | 1994 |
| APPEAL NUMBER: | WA | 32L | of | 2008 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 3 July 2009 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Perth |
| PLACE HEARD: | Perth |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Finn, Coleman and May JJ |
| HEARING DATE: | 2 July 2009 |
| LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: | Magistrates Court of Western Australia |
| LOWER COURT JUDGMENT DATE: | 29 April 2008 |
| LOWER COURT MNC: |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT: | Mr Jones |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPELLANT: | Peterson & Dowding |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Self represented |
Orders
That the applicant/appellant father be granted leave to appeal paragraph 1 of the orders of 29 April 2008.
That the appeal against paragraph 1 of the orders of 29 April 2008 be allowed.
That sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph 1 of the orders of 29 April 2008 be amended to read:
“from 1 January 2003 to 7 September 2003 on the basis that the liable parent’s child support income amount is $88,900.00 per annum; and”
That sub-paragraph (c) of paragraph 1 of the orders of 29 April 2008 be amended to read:
“from 1 January 2005 to 1 July 2005 on the basis that the liable parent’s child support income amount is $94,067.00 per annum.”
That the Court grants to the applicant/appellant father a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions of s 9 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to the appellant father in respect of the costs incurred by the applicant/appellant father in relation to the appeal.
That the Court grants to the respondent mother a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions of s 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to the respondent mother in respect of the costs incurred by the respondent mother in relation to the appeal.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Van de Berg & Van de Berg is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| THE FULL COURT OF THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PERTH |
Appeal Number: WA 32L of 2008
File Number: (P)PTW 4816 of 1994
| Mr Van de Berg |
Applicant/Appellant…
Continue reading Van de Berg & Van de Berg
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Van de Berg & Van de Berg [2009] FamCAFC 112
- Case
- [2009] FamCAFC 112
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the applicant/appellant father be granted leave to appeal paragraph 1 of the orders of 29 April 2008.
2.
That the appeal against paragraph 1 of the orders of 29 April 2008 be allowed.
3.
That sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph 1 of the orders of 29 April 2008 be amended to read:
“from 1 January 2003 to 7 September 2003 on the basis that the liable parent’s child support income amount is $88,900.00 per annum; and”
4.
That sub-paragraph (c) of paragraph 1 of the orders of 29 April 2008 be amended to read:
“from 1 January 2005 to 1 July 2005 on the basis that the liable parent’s child support income amount is $94,067.00 per annum.”
5.
That the Court grants to the applicant/appellant father a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions of s 9 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to the appellant father in respect of the costs incurred by the applicant/appellant father in relation to the appeal.
6.
That the Court grants to the respondent mother a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions of s 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to the respondent mother in respect of the costs incurred by the respondent mother in relation to the appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.