FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| VALLANS & VALLANS | [2018] FCCA 3841 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Parenting – where a contravention application was filed – where there is an oral application for sole parental responsibility – where there are communication issues – where an order for sole parental responsibility is made. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss.60B, 60B(1)(d), 60B(2)(d), 60CA, 61DA, 61DA(1), |
| Applicant: | MR VALLANS |
| Respondent: | MS VALLANS |
| File Number: | BRC 7407 of 2013 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Middleton |
| Hearing date: | 22 November 2018 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 22 November 2018 |
| Delivered at: | Brisbane |
| Delivered on: | 22 November 2018 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Ehlers |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Steindl Bradley & Associates |
| The Respondent in person |
ORDERS
That order 1 of the Orders issued 27 January 2015 be discharged.
That the mother have sole parental responsibility for the children [B] born … 2010 and [C] born … 2012 but when making any decisions about long term issues the mother must;
(a)Inform the father in writing of the decision to be made;
(b)Invite written comment from the father;
(c)Take such comments into account when making the decision;
(d)Inform the father in writing of the decision.
That the mother in exercising her sole parental responsibility the mother is restrained by injunction from changing the children’s names and from relocating their residence such that it interferes with the children’s time with their father pursuant to the orders made 27 January 2015.
That the father is to ensure that the children attend any Grand Final, grading examinations, recitals or presentations relating to the children’s extracurricular activity that occurs on a weekend.
All outstanding applications are dismissed and the proceedings are removed from the active pending cases list.
IT IS NOTED:
(A)That pursuant to s.65DA(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 the particulars of the obligations these orders create and the particulars of the consequences that may follow if a person contravenes these orders are set out in the document attached to these orders titled “Parenting orders – obligations, consequences and who can help”.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Vallans & Vallans is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
No. BRC 7407 of 2013
| MR VALLANS |
Applicant
And
| MS VALLANS |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Ex Tempore:
These reasons for judgment were delivered orally. They have been corrected from the transcript. Grammatical errors have been corrected and an attempt has been made to render the orally delivered reasons amenable to being read.
This is a parenting application involving two children, [B] aged eight, and [C] aged five, soon to be six. Their parents were in a relationship, cohabitating in 2008, marrying in 2010, and separating in May of 2013.
Final orders were entered into by consent on 27 January 2015. On 21 December 2015, the father filed a contravention application. That application was ultimately dismissed. On 13 May 2016, the father filed a second contravention application,…
Continue reading Vallans and Vallans
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Vallans and Vallans [2018] FCCA 3841
- Case
- [2018] FCCA 3841
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court's reasoning focused on the best interests of the children. Judge Middleton ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for the children. However, this was qualified by specific procedural requirements for decisions concerning long-term issues, mandating that the mother inform the father in writing of proposed decisions, invite his written comment, take those comments into account, and then inform him of the final decision.
Furthermore, the mother was restrained by injunction from changing the children's names or relocating their residence in a manner that would interfere with the father's time with them as previously ordered. The father was also directed to ensure the children's attendance at specific extracurricular events occurring on weekends. All outstanding applications were dismissed, and the proceedings were removed from the active pending cases list.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That order 1 of the Orders issued 27 January 2015 be discharged.
2.
That the mother have sole parental responsibility for the children [B] born … 2010 and [C] born … 2012 but when making any decisions about long term issues the mother must;
(a) Inform the father in writing of the decision to be made;
(b) Invite written comment from the father;
(c) Take such comments into account when making the decision;
(d) Inform the father in writing of the decision.
3.
That the mother in exercising her sole parental responsibility the mother is restrained by injunction from changing the children’s names and from relocating their residence such that it interferes with the children’s time with their father pursuant to the orders made 27 January 2015.
4.
That the father is to ensure that the children attend any Grand Final, grading examinations, recitals or presentations relating to the children’s extracurricular activity that occurs on a weekend.
5.
All outstanding applications are dismissed and the proceedings are removed from the active pending cases list.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.