| [2025] FWC 753 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union
v
Maurice Blackburn Pty Ltd T/A Maurice Blackburn Lawyers
(B2025/484)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 17 MARCH 2025 |
Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2025/201.
This matter concerns the declaration of the result of a protected action ballot PR783922 held in matter B2025/201 and declared on 18 February 2025.
The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union has made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by the relevant protected action ballot.
Section 459(3) of the Act provides as follows:
“(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.”
The application contends that each of the relevant requirements have been met and that the period should be extended by a further 30 days.
Maurice Blackburn Pty Ltd trading as Maurice Blackburn Lawyers has advised the Commission it has no objection to this application.
I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of the Act have been met and that the application should be granted.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 459(3) of the Act, I order that the 30 day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by the Employer be extended by a further 30 days.
This order will operate on and from 19 March 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR785265>
- AGLC
- v Maurice Blackburn Pty Ltd T/A Maurice Blackburn Lawyers [2025] FWC 753
- Case
- [2025] FWC 753
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the requirements of section 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 were satisfied, thereby justifying the extension of the 30-day period for protected industrial action. The union's application needed to demonstrate that it had applied for the extension and that the period had not already been extended. The Deputy President needed to consider these elements and determine if the application was eligible for an extension based on the union's compliance with the statutory criteria.
The Deputy President found that the union had met the requirements set out in section 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009. The union had applied for the extension, and there was no evidence that the period had been previously extended. Additionally, the employer, Maurice Blackburn Pty Ltd, had no objection to the application. Therefore, the Deputy President concluded that the union's application should be granted, and the 30-day period for the commencement of protected industrial action would be extended by a further 30 days. This decision was made on the basis that the union had fulfilled the statutory conditions for an extension and that the employer had not opposed the application.
In light of the findings, the Deputy President ordered that the 30-day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by Maurice Blackburn Pty Ltd be extended by a further 30 days. This extension would commence on 19 March 2025. The decision was made pursuant to section 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 and aimed to ensure that the union's application was processed in accordance with the statutory framework.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.