| [2024] FWC 2271 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
The Australian Workers' Union
v
Innovative Asset Solutions Pty Ltd
(B2024/1076)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 23 AUGUST 2024 |
Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2024/811.
This matter concerns the declaration of the result of a protected action ballot PR776395 held in matter B2024/811 and declared on 11 July 2024.
The Australian Workers' Union has made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by the relevant protected action ballot.
Section 459(3) of the Act provides as follows:
“(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.”
The application contends that each of the relevant requirements have been met and that the period should be extended by a further 30 days.
Innovative Asset Solutions Pty Ltd has advised the Commission it has no objection to this application.
I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of the Act have been met and that the application should be granted.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 459(3) of the Act, I order that the 30 day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by the Employer be extended by a further 30 days.
This order will operate on and from 23 August 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR778625>
- AGLC
- v Innovative Asset Solutions Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 2271
- Case
- [2024] FWC 2271
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the requirements of section 459(3) of the Act had been satisfied, thereby justifying an extension of the 30-day period. The union argued that it had applied to the Commission for an extension and that the period had not been extended previously. The employer did not oppose the application. The Deputy President was satisfied that the union had met the requirements of the Act and that the application should be granted.
In its decision, the Deputy President noted that the union had met the statutory criteria for an extension, and that the employer did not object to the application. The Deputy President was satisfied that the extension was appropriate and granted the union's application. The 30-day period for the commencement of protected industrial action was extended by a further 30 days, effective from 23 August 2024. The Deputy President's order reflected the union's application and provided clarity on the extended timeline for industrial action in this matter.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.