| [2024] FWC 3179 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
United Workers' Union
v
Accolade Wines Australia Limited T/A Accolade Wines
(B2024/1478)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 19 NOVEMBER 2024 |
Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2024/1266.
This matter concerns the declaration of the result of a protected action ballot PR779737 held in matter B2024/1266 and declared on 16 October 2024.
The United Workers' Union has made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by the relevant protected action ballot.
Section 459(3) of the Act provides as follows:
“(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.”
The application contends that each of the relevant requirements have been met and that the period should be extended by a further 30 days.
Accolade Wines Australia Limited T/A Accolade Wines has not advised the Commission of any objection to this application.
I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of the Act have been met and that the application should be granted.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 459(3) of the Act, I order that the 30 day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by the Employer be extended by a further 30 days.
This order will operate on and from 14 November 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR781358>
- AGLC
- v Accolade Wines Australia Limited T/A Accolade Wines [2024] FWC 3179
- Case
- [2024] FWC 3179
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the requirements for extending the period under section 459(3) of the Act were satisfied. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the applicant had applied for the extension and whether the period had not been previously extended. The application argued that both conditions were met and that the extension was warranted. The employer's lack of objection also played a role in the decision-making process.
The Deputy President found that the requirements for an extension were indeed met. The application was made by the applicant, and there was no prior extension of the period. Consequently, the Deputy President ruled that the 30-day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees should be extended by an additional 30 days. This extension would commence from 14 November 2024.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.