Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1723 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 24 November 2017 Date of orders: 15 December 2017 Decision date: 15 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Ms J Reid (Applicant)
Swaab Attorneys (Applicant)
Ms K Mortimer, Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/ 215034 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the following amended material:
Drawing No. and Issue
Drawing Title
Prepared by
Date of Plan
Drawing No. DA01/02, Rev B
Subdivision Plan
The Bathla Group
November 2017
Drawing No. DA02/02, Rev B
Subdivision Plan Road Pattern
The Bathla Group
November 2017
Plan No. 000, Rev B
Cover Sheet
Orion Consulting Engineers
Undated
Plan No. 001, Rev B
General Arrangement Plan, Notes & Legend
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 002, Rev B
Demolition & Tree Removal Plan
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 003, Rev B
Site Regrading Plan
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 004, Rev B
Site Regrading Sections – Sheet 01 of 02
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 005, Rev B
Site Regrading Sections – Sheet 02 of 02
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 010, Rev B
Sediment & Erosion Control Plan
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 011, Rev B
Sediment & Erosion Control Plan Notes & Details
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 013, Rev B
Engineering Plan
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 014, Rev B
Inset A, Sections & Details
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 020, Rev B
Road Longitudinal Sections – Sheet 01 of 03
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 021, Rev B
Road Longitudinal Sections – Sheet 02 of 03
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 022, Rev B
Road Longitudinal Sections – Sheet 03 of 03
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 030, Rev B
Catchment Plan
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 040, Rev B
Basin Setout Plan, Sections & Details
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
Plan No. 41, Rev B
Bio-Retention Details & Planting
Orion Consulting Engineers
27 November 2017
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. DA-16-05399, for the subdivision of Lot 6 Section Q DP712 (known as 124 Cranbourne Street, Riverstone) into 6 lots, construction of public road and associated storm water drainage is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure 'A'.
……………………….
S Dixon
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (C) (379 KB, pdf)
(Subdiv Plans) (214 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1723
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1723
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was the interpretation of the lease agreement, specifically the circumstances under which the plaintiff could terminate the lease. The court was required to determine whether the conditions specified in the lease for termination had been met. The Council also argued that there were implied terms in the lease that prevented unilateral termination by the plaintiff. The court needed to assess whether such terms could be implied into the contract.
The court found that the conditions for termination were not satisfied, as the alleged breaches by the tenant had not occurred. The Council’s argument regarding implied terms was also rejected as the court held that the terms were not necessary to give business efficacy to the contract. The court held that the lease was valid and binding, and that the plaintiff was not entitled to terminate it on the grounds advanced. Consequently, the Council was not required to vacate the premises.
The court ordered that the plaintiff's claim for a declaration that it was entitled to terminate the lease was dismissed. The court further ordered that the Council was entitled to continue occupying the premises under the terms of the lease. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the Council's costs of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.