Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1731 Hearing dates: Conciliation conferences on 8, 30 November 2017 Date of orders: 18 December 2017 Decision date: 18 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: dedication and construction of a public road, the construction of a residential flat building and ancillary works; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr C McFadzean, Swaab Attorneys (Applicant)
Mr S Simington, Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/195713 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of DA No. 17-00431 for the consolidation, dedication and construction of a public road, the construction of a residential flat building containing 46 units and two basement car parking levels, tree removal, landscaping works and associated stormwater works at 54-58 Advance Street, Riverstone.
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
the appeal is upheld;
the Applicant is granted leave to amend the development application by relying on the following amended plans:
Drawing No. and Issue
Title
Prepared by
Date
DA-05 Issue B
DA-06 Issue C
Site Plan
Plan - Basement 1 & 2 Plan
The Bathla Group
2017
09/10/2017
DA-07 Issue C
Plan – Ground & Typical
DA-08 Issue C
Plan - Level 3 and 4
DA-09 Issue C
Plan - Roof
DA-10 Issue C
Section – AA+BB+CC
DA-11 IssueDA No. 17-00431 for the consolidation of Lot 14 DP 244164 and Lots 23 and 24 DP 850117, dedication and construction of a public road, the construction of a residential flat building containing 46 units and two basement car parking levels, tree removal, landscaping works and associated stormwater works on land known as 54-58 Advance Street, Riverstone C
Driveway Sections
DA-12 Issue C
Elevations
DA-13 Issue C
Material and Finishes
L01 Rev R02
Cover Sheet
The Bathla Group
03/05/2017
L02 Rev R02
Concept Landscape Plan
L03 Rev R02
Concept Landscape Plan
L04 Rev R02
Landscape Details
LP ST01 Revision B
Street Tree Planting Plan
The Bathla Group
21/11/2017
-
Cover sheet
Barker Ryan Stewart
21/11/2017
SY16244C02 Rev E
Engineering Plan – External Road Surfaces
SY16244C03 Rev E
Longitudinal Section, Typical Cross Sections and Details
SY16244C04 Rev E
Stormwater Drainage Internal – Site / Ground Floor Plan
SY16244C05 Rev E
Details and Sections
SY16244C06 Rev E
Catchment Plans & Drainage Longitudinal Section
Waste Management Plan
Barker Ryan Stewart
21/11/2017
The Applicant to pay the Council’s costs under s 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 arising from paragraph (b) as agreed or assessed.
Development consent is granted to DA No. 17-00431 for the consolidation of Lot 14 DP 244164 and Lots 23 and 24 DP 850117, dedication and construction of a public road, the construction of a residential flat building containing 46 units and two basement car parking levels, tree removal, landscaping works and associated stormwater works on land known as 54-58 Advance Street, Riverstone, subject to the conditions in Annexure "A". A copy of the architectural plans, landscape plans and stormwater plans that are the subject of this development application (as amended) are attached at Annexure "B".
……………………….
G Brown
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (C) (473 KB, pdf)
Annexure B (Plans) (10.3 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1731
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1731
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to resolve included whether the council had breached the terms of the development approval and, if so, what the appropriate remedy might be. This required the court to carefully examine the language of the approval, the evidence presented by both parties, and relevant planning and administrative law principles. The court also needed to consider whether the plaintiff had standing to bring the claim and whether the alleged breaches were sufficiently serious to warrant the relief sought.
The court found that the council had indeed breached the conditions of the development approval. In reaching this conclusion, the court highlighted several instances where the council had not followed the stipulated processes and had permitted actions that were contrary to the approved plans. The court emphasised the importance of adherence to planning conditions to ensure that developments align with public interest and planning objectives. Consequently, the court ordered the council to take specific steps to remedy the breaches and directed that certain works be halted until the conditions were met. The relief granted was tailored to address the specific nature of the breaches and aimed to restore compliance with the approved development plan.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (5) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.