Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council

Case

[2017] NSWLEC 1733

18 December 2017

No judgment structure available for this case.

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1733
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 20 October 2017, 27 November 2017
Date of orders: 18 December 2017
Decision date: 18 December 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Brown C
Decision:

See (5) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: construction of a mixed use development; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Ms E Flemming, Swaab Attorneys (Applicant)
Ms J Hewitt, HWL Ebsworth(Respondent)
File Number(s):2017/186954
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application No. DA-17-00675 for the construction of a mixed use development including ground floor retail and shop top housing comprising three levels containing 60 units, rooftop common open space, basement car parking and landscaping and stormwater drainage at 81-91 Railway Terrace, Schofields.

  2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  3. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  5. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the following amended material:

Drawing No. and Issue

Drawing Title

Prepared by

Date of Plan

DA 01, Issue C

Cover Sheet

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 02, Issue C

Compliance Table

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 05, Issue C

Site Plan

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 07, Issue C

Basement 1 Plan

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 08, Issue C

Basement 2 Plan

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA09, Issue C

Ground Floor Plan

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 10, Issue C

Level 1 Plan

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 11, Issue C

Level 2 Plan

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 12, Issue C

Level 3 Plan

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 13, Issue C

Roof Plan

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 14, Issue C

Elevations 1

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 15, Issue C

Elevations 2

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 16, Issue C

Sections 1

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 17, Issue C

Sections 2

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 18, Issue C

Materials and Finishes

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 19, Issue C

Shadow Diagram

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 20, Issue C

Solar Access

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 21, Issue C

Cross Ventilation

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 22, Issue C

Area Clac. – GFA

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 23, Issue C

Area Calc. Landscape – COS Deep Soil

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 24, Issue C

Building Height Compliance

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 25, Issue C

3D Views

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 26, Issue C

Typical Adaptable & Liveable Unit

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 27, Issue C

Frontage Detail

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 28, Issue C

Internal Storage Calculation

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

DA 29, Issue C

Notification Plan

The Bathla Group

7 November 2017

SY16165C01, Issue D

Stormwater Drainwater Layout Plan – Site Plan

Ryan Barker Stewart

15 November 2017

SY16165C02, Issue D

Details and Sections

Ryan Barker Stewart

15 November 2017

SY16165C03, Issue D

Details and Sections

Ryan Barker Stewart

15 November 2017

SY16165C04, Issue D

Soil and Water Management Plan

Ryan Barker Stewart

15 November 2017

SY16165C05, Issue D

Soil and Water Management Details

Ryan Barker Stewart

15 November 2017

SY16165C06, Issue D

OSD Details and Sections

Ryan Barker Stewart

15 November 2017

CA17/122/2001

Construction Management Plan

The Bathla Group

10 November 2017

Not applicable

Vegetation Management Plan

Dominic Fanning - Gunninah

November 2017

Not Applicable

Waste Management Plan

The Bathla Group

Undated

809939M_02

BASIX Certificate

Ecoinnovate

8 November 2017

  1. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs under section 97B of the Environmental Planning Assessment Act 1979 in the amount of $6,700 within 28 days.

  2. Development Application No. DA-17-00675 for the construction of a mixed use development including ground floor retail and shop top housing comprising three levels containing 60 units, rooftop common open space, basement car parking and landscaping and stormwater drainage on Lot 9 DP237933 and Lot 9 and Lot 10 DP18574 (known as 81-91 Railway Terrace, Schofields), is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure 'A'.

……………………….

G Brown

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (C)

Annexure B

Amendments

19 December 2017 - Correct date of orders and decision.

Decision last updated: 19 December 2017

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

2