Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1277 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 8 June 2018 Date of orders: 08 June 2018 Decision date: 08 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
E Fleming, Swaab Attorneys (Applicant)
L Raffaele, Bartier Perry(Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/248406 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the following amended material:
Proposed Lot 1 amended material:
Drawing reference
Title
Prepared by
Date
DA01, Revision C
Site Analysis – Lot 1
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA02, Revision C
Site Plan – Lot 1
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA03, Revision C
Ground Floor Plan – Lot 1
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA04, Revision C
First Floor Plan – Lot 1
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA05, Revision C
Elevations & Sections – Lot 1
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA06, Revision C
Shadow Analysis 1 – Lot 1
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA07, Revision C
Shadow Analysis 2 – Lot 1
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA08, Revision C
Site coverage
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
LP-01, Issue B
Lot 1 Concept Landscape Plan
The Bathla Group
1 March 2018
11041910/DA01, Revision B
Cover Sheet and Locality Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
Undated
11041910/DA02, Revision B
Legends, Notes and Index
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA03, Revision B
Drainage and Grading Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA04, Revision B
Catchment Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA05, Revision B
Pavement Plan and Materials
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA06, Revision A
Carcourt Detail Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA07,
Revision B
Carcourt Typical Sections
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA08,
Revision A
Carcourt Longitudinal Sections
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA09,
Revision A
Retaining Wall Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA10,
Revision A
Retaining Wall Longitudinal and Typical Sections
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA11,
Revision A
Drainage Longitudinal Sections Sheet 1
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA12,
Revision A
Drainage Longitudinal Sections Sheet 2
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA13,
Revision B
Stormwater General Drainage Details Sheet 1
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA14,
Revision A
Stormwater General Drainage Details Sheet 2
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041911/DA15,
Revision B
Stormfilter System Details Sheet 1
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA16
Revision B
Stormfilter System Details Sheet 2
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA17
Revision A
Drainage Calculations Sheet 1
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA18
Revision A
Drainage Calculations Sheet 2
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA19
Revision B
Soil and Water Management Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA20
Revision B
Soil and Water Management Notes
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
11041910/DA21
Revision B
Soil and Water Management Details
J. Wyndam Prince
24 April 2018
110419-04 (Rpt1B)
Storm Water and Water Quality Report
J. Wyndam Prince
1 May 2018
Proposed Lot 14 amended material:
Drawing reference
Title
Prepared by
Date
DA01, Revision C
Site Analysis – Lot 14
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA02, Revision C
Site Plan – Lot 14
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA03, Revision C
Ground Floor Plan – Lot 14
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA04, Revision C
First Floor Plan – Lot 14
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA05, Revision C
Elevations & Sections – Lot 14
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA06, Revision C
Shadow Analysis 1 – Lot 14
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
DA07, Revision C
Shadow Analysis 2 – Lot 14
The Bathla Group
26 February 2018
LP-01, Issue B
Lot 1 Concept Landscape Plan
The Bathla Group
1 March 2018
11041910/DA151, Revision B
Cover Sheet and Locality Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
Undated
11041910/DA152, Revision B
Legends, Notes and Index
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA153, Revision B
Drainage and Grading Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA154, Revision B
Catchment Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA155, Revision B
Pavement Plan and Materials
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA156, Revision A
Carcourt Detail Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA157,
Revision B
Carcourt Typical Sections
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA158,
Revision A
Carcourt Longitudinal Sections
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA159,
Revision A
Retaining Wall Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA160
Revision A
Retaining Wall Longitudinal and Typical Sections
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA161,
Revision A
Drainage Longitudinal Sections Sheet
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA162,
Revision B
Stormwater General Drainage Details Sheet 1
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA163,
Revision A
Stormwater General Drainage Details Sheet 2
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041911/DA164,
Revision B
Stormfilter System Details
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA165
Revision A
Drainage Calculations Sheet 1
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA166
Revision A
Drainage Calculations Sheet 2
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA167
Revision B
Soil and Water Management Plan
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA168
Revision B
Soil and Water Management Notes
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
11041910/DA169
Revision B
Soil and Water Management Details
J. Wyndam Prince
26 April 2018
110419-04 (Rpt1B)
Storm Water and Water Quality Report
J. Wyndam Prince
1 May 2018
815310M_02
BASIX Certificate
TBC
TBC
The appeal is upheld.
The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs under section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.
Development Application No. DA-17-00936, as amended, for the erection of 82 multi dwelling housing dwellings, internal private roads, stormwater drainage, and landscaping works on Lots 1 and 14 in the approved subdivision (DA-16-03182) on land identified as Lot 8 in DP235714 known as 1140 Richmond Road, Marsden Park, is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure 'A'.
……………………….
Michael Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (539 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1277
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1277
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the conditions imposed by the Council were consistent with the statutory framework governing development approvals. Specifically, the court had to determine if the conditions were necessary and reasonable in light of the objectives of the relevant planning legislation. The plaintiff argued that the conditions were overly restrictive and not in accordance with the statutory criteria, while the Council contended that the conditions were valid and properly exercised its statutory powers.
The court held that the conditions imposed by the Council were indeed consistent with the statutory framework. The judge found that the conditions were necessary to achieve the objectives of the planning legislation and were not beyond the powers granted to the Council. The court emphasised the importance of balancing the rights of developers with the broader public interest in responsible land use. In reaching its decision, the court closely examined the evidence and statutory provisions, concluding that the Council had exercised its discretion appropriately. The court dismissed the plaintiff's challenge, thereby upholding the validity of the development approval and the conditions imposed by the Council.
As a result of the court's decision, the plaintiff's application to set aside the development approval and the conditions was dismissed. The court did not grant the relief sought by the plaintiff, thereby affirming the Council's decision and the imposed conditions. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the Council's costs of the proceeding.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.