| [2023] FWC 418 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
United Workers’ Union
v
Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Limited;
Southcorp Wines Pty Ltd
(B2023/125)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 20 FEBRUARY 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Limited and Southcorp Wines Pty Ltd
This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Limited and Southcorp Wines Pty Ltd (Respondent).
On 20 February 2023, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Tashe Linke of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.
Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.
An order has been separately issued in PR750923.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR750922>
- AGLC
- United Workers' Union v Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Limited [2023] FWC 418
- Case
- [2023] FWC 418
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to address were whether the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer, whether there was a notification time for the proposed agreement, and if the union had complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The union also sought to appoint Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS as the ballot agent for the protected action ballot, instead of the Australian Electoral Commission.
The Deputy President found that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer and that there was a notification time for the proposed agreement. The union had also complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Deputy President was satisfied that CiVS was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot, and that the secrecy and security of the votes would be ensured. Therefore, CiVS was appointed as the protected action ballot agent.
The Fair Work Commission granted the union's application for a protected action ballot order and appointed CiVS as the ballot agent. The decision was made without the need for a hearing, as the employer did not object to the application. The Deputy President was satisfied that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer and that the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been met. The court also found that CiVS was a suitable and capable ballot agent, and that it would ensure the secrecy and security of the votes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.