United Workers' Union v The Star Entertainment Qld Limited

Case [2025] FWC 1631


[2025] FWC 1631

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

United Workers’ Union
v

The Star Entertainment Qld Limited

(B2025/918)

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 12 JUNE 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of The Star Entertainment Qld Limited

  1. The United Workers’ Union (UWU) has made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a protected action ballot order (PABO) in relation to certain employees of The Star Entertainment Qld Limited (the Respondent).

  1. A related application also been made in relation to employees of the Respondent by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU).

  1. On 11 June 2025, the Respondent advised that it objected to the application on various grounds and further, sought a period of greater than three working days of notice pursuant to s.414(2) of the Act.    

  1. Directions were issued to the parties on 11 June 2025 to file submissions and witness statements on 12 June 2025, with a hearing to be conducted at 4:00pm on 12 June 2025.   The Respondent largely failed to comply with the directions, other than to copy the Commission into correspondence sent to the UWU.

  1. At the hearing of the matter, the Respondent withdrew its objections to the application. No evidence was offered in respect of why the notice period should be longer than three working days.  Accordingly, the Commission is not satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice being longer than three working days. 

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Mr Chirstopher Barnes, UWU Organiser setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Respondent and confirming that the UWU has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. I am satisfied that the UWU has given notice in accordance with s.440 of the Act.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close in the ballot is 26 June 2025. This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and is consequently authorised to conduct the ballot.[1] The scheme of the Act is now that where named in the PABO application and proposed orders, the Commission will, subject to the Act, be obliged to, in effect, appoint that eligible protected action ballot agent to conduct the ballot concerned.

  1. The Order [PR788157] will be issued concurrently with this Decision.

  1. This matter will be listed for a s.448A conference. An Order and Directions will be issued shortly requiring attendance at the conference.

COMMISSIONER

Appearances:

S Gill for the UWU.

K Singh and N Brown for the Respondent.

Hearing details:

2025.
Brisbane.
12 June.


[1] Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1775.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR788158>

Details
AGLC
United Workers' Union v The Star Entertainment Qld Limited [2025] FWC 1631
Case
[2025] FWC 1631
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) was asked by the United Workers' Union (UWU) to allow a protected action ballot for certain employees of The Star Entertainment Qld Limited (Star). Star opposed the application and requested more than the three working days' notice required by the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act). However, on the day of the hearing, Star withdrew its objections and did not provide any evidence to support the need for a longer notice period. The FWC determined that exceptional circumstances did not exist, and the standard three working days' notice period was appropriate. The FWC was satisfied that the UWU had followed all necessary steps and genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Star, thus fulfilling the requirements of the FW Act. The FWC set the voting deadline for the ballot as 26 June 2025, and authorised Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd to conduct the ballot. The FWC will issue an order for the ballot and schedule a conference under section 448A of the FW Act.

The main legal issue in this case was whether the FWC should grant the UWU's application for a protected action ballot and whether the required notice period should be extended beyond the standard three working days. Star argued for a longer notice period but failed to provide any justification or evidence for this request. The FWC considered the statutory declaration from the UWU, which outlined the union's efforts to negotiate with Star and confirmed that all requirements of the FW Act had been met. The FWC determined that exceptional circumstances did not exist to warrant a longer notice period, and that the UWU had fulfilled all necessary steps under the FW Act. The FWC was satisfied that the UWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Star, and thus, the application for a protected action ballot should be granted. The FWC set the voting deadline for the ballot as 26 June 2025 and authorised Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd to conduct the ballot. The FWC will issue an order for the ballot and schedule a conference under section 448A of the FW Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.