| [2024] FWC 3417 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
United Workers' Union
v
Thales Australia Limited
(B2024/1599)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 6 DECEMBER 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Thales Australia Limited
This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (UWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Thales Australia Limited (Thales or Employer).
I note that the Application by "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 5 December 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application, as amended.[2]
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ian Madgwick, Co-ordinator, setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Thales, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 19 December 2024.[3] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR782173.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2024/1588.
[2] The UWU provided an amended F34 and Draft Order to ensure the employees to be balloted and the date voting is to close was consistent between the forms.
[3] This is, in effect, 9 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR782175>
- AGLC
- United Workers' Union v Thales Australia Limited [2024] FWC 3417
- Case
- [2024] FWC 3417
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court involved determining whether the UWU had met the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot order, including whether a notification time existed and whether the UWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Thales. Additionally, the court had to ascertain whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and if the ballot agent, Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, was eligible and authorised to conduct the ballot.
In rendering the decision, the Deputy President Hampton found that all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act had been satisfied, as evidenced by the declaration from Ian Madgwick, Co-ordinator, and the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with Thales. The court concluded that a notification time was in effect and that the UWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer. Furthermore, the court noted that Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd was an approved ballot agent under section 468A of the Act. The Deputy President Hampton set the closing date for voting at 19 December 2024, which aligns with the statutory requirements. The matter will proceed to a compulsory conciliation conference, overseen by another member of the Commission, to facilitate meaningful negotiations between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.