| [2023] FWC 3325 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
United Workers’ Union
v
Nestle Australia Limited T/A Uncle Tobys
(B2023/1363)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | MELBOURNE, 13 DECEMBER 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Nestle Australia Limited
This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (UWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Nestle Australia Limited T/A Uncle Toby’s (Nestle or Employer).
On 12 December 2023, the Commission was advised, in effect, that Nestle did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Nick Gordon on behalf of the UWU, setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Nestle, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 30 January 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An order has been separately issued in PR769351.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order, which is the period required by the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct a ballot. The Applicant sought the ballot close date as 11 January 2024, which has been extended to meet the requirements of the AEC as advised in earlier correspondence from the Commission.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR769350>
- AGLC
- United Workers' Union v Nestle Australia Limited T/A Uncle Tobys [2023] FWC 3325
- Case
- [2023] FWC 3325
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues for the Commission to decide included whether the UWU had met the requirements of section 443 of the Act to organise a ballot for protected action and if the proposed timing for the ballot was reasonable. The Commission had to consider the declaration from Mr Nick Gordon on behalf of the UWU, which outlined the bargaining process and the union's efforts to reach an agreement with Nestle. Additionally, the Commission needed to set a closing date for the ballot that would accommodate the Australian Electoral Commission's requirements for conducting the vote.
In deciding the matter, Deputy President Hampton was satisfied that the UWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Nestle and that there was a notification time for the proposed agreement. The Commission determined that the UWU had met all the requirements under section 443 of the Act to organise a ballot. The Deputy President set the closing date for voting at 30 January 2023, which allowed sufficient time for the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct the ballot. This decision also established the ballot period for the purposes of section 448A of the Act.
The Commission issued an order for the ballot to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission, with the closing date for voting set at 30 January 2023. This matter will proceed to a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act, which will require the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement. Directions will likely be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference prepared for meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.