| [2023] FWC 357 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
United Workers’ Union
v
Hempel (Wattyl) Australia Pty Ltd
(B2023/104)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 14 FEBRUARY 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Hempel (Wattyl) Australia Pty Ltd.
This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Hempel (Wattyl) Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent).
On 14 February 2023, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Darren Roberts of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.
Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.
An order has been separately issued in PR750574.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR750573>
- AGLC
- United Workers' Union v Hempel (Wattyl) Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 357
- Case
- [2023] FWC 357
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved whether the notification time for the proposed agreement was valid and if the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act were met. Additionally, the Union requested that a party other than the Australian Electoral Commission act as the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. The proposed alternative was Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS, which was not opposed by the respondent. The Union's Managing Director provided a statutory declaration affirming CiVS's capability and willingness to conduct the ballot, ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes.
After reviewing the submitted materials, the Deputy President determined that CiVS was a suitable choice for the ballot agent role. The person named in the application, Mr Michael M Michael, and CiVS were deemed capable and committed to handling the ballot securely and efficiently. Furthermore, CiVS agreed to abide by the Privacy Act 1998 concerning the information related to the protected action ballot. Consequently, the Deputy President appointed CiVS as the protected action ballot agent, and an order was separately issued in PR750574.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.