United Workers' Union v Crown Melbourne Ltd

Case [2022] FWC 549


[2022] FWC 549

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

United Workers’ Union
v

Crown Melbourne Ltd

(B2022/183)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 11 MARCH 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Crown Melbourne Ltd.

  1. This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Crown Melbourne Ltd (Respondent).

  1. On 10 February 2022, my Associate was advised that the Respondent objected to the application. However, on 11 March 2022, the parties were able to reach a consent position.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Hannah Miflin of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

  1. Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR739249.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR739248>

Details
AGLC
United Workers' Union v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2022] FWC 549
Case
[2022] FWC 549
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission was asked to decide on an application by the United Workers' Union for a protected action ballot for certain employees of Crown Melbourne Ltd. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Initially, Crown Melbourne Ltd objected to the application but later, on 11 March 2022, the parties reached a consent position. The Deputy President decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

The legal issues before the court were whether there was a notification period for the proposed agreement and whether the requirements in section 443(1) of the Act were met. The court also needed to decide if Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS was a fit and proper person to be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. The United Workers' Union argued that it had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Crown Melbourne Ltd, and that CiVS was capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and conducting the ballot expeditiously.

The Deputy President was satisfied that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in section 443(1) of the Act were met. The court was also satisfied that CiVS was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot, and that Mr Michael and CiVS were capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVS agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and was bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

Therefore, the Fair Work Commission appointed CiVS as the protected action ballot agent. An order has been separately issued in PR739249.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.