United Workers' Union v Bega Dairy and Drinks Pty Ltd T/A Bega

[2023] FWC 1945

[2023] FWC 1945

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

United Workers' Union
v

Bega Dairy and Drinks Pty Ltd T/A Bega

(B2023/805)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 7 AUGUST 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Bega Dairy and Drinks Pty Ltd

1. This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (UWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Bega Dairy and Drinks Pty Ltd T/A Bega (Bega or Employer). 

1. On 7 August 2023, the Commission was advised that Bega, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended.[1]  

1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.  

1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Leonidas Papanastasiou, UWU Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Bega, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.  

1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) and s.448A(2) of the Act, a ballot period of 30 working days from the date of the Order (7 August 2023) has been determined by this Commission.

1. An order has been separately issued in PR764933.

1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. To the extent that this matter involves additional bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement, the Commission will issue a further Order requiring their attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

[1] The Respondent had requested amendments be made to Clause three (3) and five (5) of the draft order; the Applicant did not object to the proposed amendments. These have been incorporated into the Order ultimately made by the Commission.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR764934>