United Workers' Union v Allied Pinnacle Pty Ltd T/A Allied Pinnacle

[2020] FWC 6423

[2020] FWC 6423

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
Section 437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

United Workers’ Union
v
Allied Pinnacle Pty Ltd T/A Allied Pinnacle
(B2020/757)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ANDERSON ADELAIDE, 2 DECEMBER 2020

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Allied Pinnacle Pty Ltd

[1] This is an application lodged on 26 November 2020 by the United Workers’ Union (the Applicant) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the FW Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Allied Pinnacle Pty Ltd T/A Allied Pinnacle (the Respondent).

[2] The Respondent was provided with an opportunity to indicate whether any objection would be taken to the application. The Respondent advised that it did not wish to advance an objection to the application.

[3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

[4] On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Benjamin Reichstein of the Applicant lodged 26 November 2020, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and confirming that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in section 443(1) of the FW Act have been met.

[5] The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots.

[6] I am satisfied on the materials before me that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

[7] CiVS is to be the ballot agent for the purposes of this Order.

[8] I am also satisfied that the Applicant has given notice in accordance with section 440 of the FW Act.

[9] An order in conformity with the FW Act is being issued in conjunction with this decision. 1

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR724987>

 1   PR724988