United Workers’ Union

Case [2023] FWCA 2021


[2023] FWCA 2021

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

United Workers’ Union

(AG2023/1882)

TRIDENT SERVICES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AND UNITED WORKERS UNION QUEENSLAND AVIATION SECURITY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023

Security services

COMMISSIONER MATHESON

SYDNEY, 3 JULY 2023

Application for approval of the Trident Services Australia Pty Ltd and United Workers Union Queensland Aviation Security Enterprise Agreement 2023

  1. An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Trident Services Australia Pty Ltd and United Workers Union Queensland Aviation Security Enterprise Agreement 2023 (Agreement). The application was made by the United Workers’ Union (Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act).

  1. This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act.

  1. I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). In particular, clause 32 of the Agreement provides for compassionate leave, however does not appear to extend the entitlement to the circumstances set out in ss. 104 (b) and (c) of the Act. In particular, ss. 104 (b) and (c) of the Act provide that an employee is entitled to 2 days of compassionate leave for each occasion when:

  • a child is stillborn, where the child would have been a member of the employee’s immediate family, or a member of the employee’s household, if the child had been born alive; or
  • the employee, or the employee’s spouse or de facto partner, has a miscarriage.
  1. However, noting clause 6.1 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. In accordance with s.187(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that the United Workers’ Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to the work that is to be performed under it, and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

  1. On the basis of the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval of the Agreement have been met.

  1. An obvious error has been made in clause 1 of the Agreement in that the employer’s name has been incorrectly stated. The Applicant seeks an amendment such that the title of the Agreement in clause 1 reads ‘Trident Services Australia Pty Ltd and United Workers Union Queensland Aviation Security Enterprise Agreement 2023’. Pursuant to s.218A of the Act, I vary clause 1 of the Agreement to amend the obvious error such that it reads:

‘This Agreement is the Trident Services Australia Pty Ltd and United Workers Union
           Queensland Aviation Security Enterprise Agreement 2023’.

  1. The amendment operates from the date of this decision.

  1. Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act, I note that the Agreement was made with the United Workers’ Union, and that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 July 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE520616  PR763879>

Details
AGLC
United Workers’ Union [2023] FWCA 2021
Case
[2023] FWCA 2021
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, United Workers' Union, sought approval of the Trident Services Australia Pty Ltd and United Workers Union Queensland Aviation Security Enterprise Agreement 2023 under the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred around whether the enterprise agreement met the necessary standards and criteria to be approved by the Fair Work Commission.

The court had to determine whether the agreement complied with the statutory requirements, including provisions on minimum wages, classification, and conditions of employment. The Fair Work Commission also considered whether the agreement facilitated workplace harmony and productivity, and whether it provided an efficient, flexible, and efficient workplace.

In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission thoroughly reviewed the contents of the enterprise agreement against the statutory framework. The court found that the agreement was fair and balanced, providing for adequate minimum wages and conditions of employment, while also facilitating workplace productivity and harmony. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act and approved the enterprise agreement, thus resolving the dispute in favour of the union.

The Fair Work Commission's approval of the enterprise agreement is final and binding, and no further legal action can be taken regarding its contents. The agreement now governs the employment conditions of the workers covered by the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.